06 ATTACHMENT 6 - Laserfiche WebLink

Commissioner Balch: Sure. Commissioner Nagler: Which is, do we support the use of the backyard for any use at all other than a buffer? Commissioner Allen: Before I answer, could I just say, would that include five people from the Mason's having lunch outside on the patio? Commissioner Nagler: That would be a use other than as a buffer, yes. Commissioner O'Connor: I would not support that. Commissioner Balch: Yes, I don't think I would either. A strict prohibition. Commissioner Allen: Greg, what are you saying, no use in the backyard? It doesn't matter, even if there are five people having lunch there? Commissioner O'Connor: No, it's a buffer. Commissioner Balch: Quick question to staff. What's the distance between the buildings to the fence? Weinstein: Let us check and we'll report back. Chair Ritter: Part of me just wants to go through line by line because then we'll have a result after this to make a motion on it. Commissioner Nagler: But people are expressing that they don't want to do that; that it doesn't matter about the details about it. Commissioner Balch: If you're talking about the use of the backyard, you're talking about the hours, the operations, all that comes in in my opinion, right? Commissioner Allen: Yes, sound attenuation and different things. Commissioner Nagler: So if you don't want the backyard used at all, you don't have to have that conversation, right? Commissioner Allen: Correct, so Greg you come out that you don't want it used at all, right? Commissioner O'Connor: I think the original Planning Commission was clear. Commissioner Allen: So I come out that it could be used for five people of the Masons having lunch. With the right restrictions, I could see some use and the reason is that if this was a home, a residence instead of the Masons, a residence would have a backyard. It would be reasonable to say they could have five visitors and their friends and sit outside and have lunch. EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 22, 2016 Page 30 of 52