My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
06 ATTACHMENT 6
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
092016
>
06 ATTACHMENT 6
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2016 11:37:54 AM
Creation date
9/15/2016 3:50:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/20/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
06
Document Relationships
06
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\092016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Allen: I'd like to hear it as well. <br />Chair Ritter: Maybe the things we pick and we just go through the conditions of approval <br />and say the things we agree on first. <br />Commissioner Nagler: Is it option 3 you want to go through? <br />Chair Ritter: Well, that's the question. It sounds like none of us.... <br />Commissioner Allen: What if we just go through the text. That's one way to start. We're <br />not approving option 3, but a way to go through those points and just say what we think. <br />That's a place to start and then we could add on additional things. <br />Commissioner Balch: I think we're going to need to do that, but from my view I think we <br />need to figure out if we're all for or not for backyard use, for Mason use or not, things <br />like that. <br />Commissioner Allen: Yes. <br />Commissioner O'Connor: There are really three or four issues. <br />Commissioner Allen: Yes, and then we can get into the details. <br />Commissioner Balch: So I guess the first question is, is anyone support staying with the <br />77 CUP as currently written? Option 1? Does anyone support staying with option 1 as <br />stated by staff? <br />Commissioner Balch, Chair Ritter, Commissioner Allen, Commissioner Nagler: No. <br />Commissioner O'Connor: Do you mean without clarifying? <br />Commissioner Balch: Yes, without clarifying any changes. Okay, does anyone support <br />revocation? Option 2? <br />All: No. <br />Commissioner Balch: We're all on the period of some modification presumably to the <br />77 CUP, okay, I'II just keep driving a little bit. So the next question then in my mind, I <br />was going to go with the building but let me go with something else. It sounds like the <br />backyard use by any party is of question, and I also think we could bifurcate it down to <br />Mason Lodge use versus non -Mason Lodge use similar to how staff has done so within <br />the staff report. Correct me if I'm wrong at any time please. So why don't we just start <br />with Mason Lodge use of the yard? I heard you say initially that you would be okay with <br />that provided there were some conditions that it didn't go out of hand. <br />Commissioner Allen: Yes, as long as we put limits on the number of times, etc. <br />Commissioner Nagler: Would you mind framing it a little different? <br />EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 22, 2016 Page 29 of 52 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.