My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
06 ATTACHMENT 5
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
092016
>
06 ATTACHMENT 5
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2016 1:07:49 PM
Creation date
9/15/2016 3:40:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/20/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
06
Document Relationships
06
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\092016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
215
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Response to Code Enforcement Officer Mark Dennis' Letter to the Millers <br />Dated March 31, 2016 <br />. 1) CUP — Condition 111 does prohibit use of the backyard contrary to your statement: <br />Condition tt1: "the guiding standards for the development of the site shall be that ... the <br />buildings be designed so that activities will be focused toward the southern portion of <br />the subject property..." <br />During the party on March 24 the backyard area on the north had several tables set up with food, <br />blankets for people to sit on. and trashcans for the paper plates on which they were eating. The <br />tables, blankets, and trashcans were all set up on the north side in the backyard and none of these <br />things were set up on the south side. Therefore, a reasonable person would conclude that there was <br />a clear focus on the north and no focus on the south. That is, this event was not "focused toward the <br />southern portion of the subject property," which is a dear violation of Condition Ill. <br />Also, we have evidence of this if you would like to request it. <br />Please respond with your feedback. <br />2) CUP — Condition #20 does prohibit use of the backyard contrary to your statement. <br />Condition 1120: "that the applicant provide an effective buffer between the development <br />and the single family residential area surrounding the property." <br />Planner Donna Decker, in an email to the Millers, defined the "buffer" as the backyard area. <br />Also, the Minutes from the 1977 Commission Hearing state, <br />"Commissioner Shepherd requested that some wording be inserted to safeguard the <br />residents from the facility, by means of buffering." <br />In the event on March 31, 2016, people used the backyard. Therefore, the backyard area was not <br />being used as a buffer and the neighbors were not being "safeguarded" from the noise nuisance. <br />Please respond with your feedback. <br />—13)....1977 staff report does prohibit use of the backyard. <br />The 1977 Staff Report states, <br />"While it might be preferable to have the lodge building farther south on the property, it <br />would be possible to design the structure so as to minimize any noise which is <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.