My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
06 ATTACHMENT 5
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
092016
>
06 ATTACHMENT 5
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2016 1:07:49 PM
Creation date
9/15/2016 3:40:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/20/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
06
Document Relationships
06
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\092016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
215
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mark Dennis <br />From: Darlene Miller <br />Sent Tuesday, May 03, 2016 11:44 AM <br />To: Mark Dennis; Adam Weinstein; Gerry Beaudin; Jay Lee <br />Cc: ncalleni greg.oconnor@ herb@ <br />jack.balch@ dnagler@ ; mmiller @i Karla Brown; <br />Kathy Narum <br />Subject Rebuttal to you letter denying Millers' code enforcement at the Masonic Lodge <br />Attachments: Noise complaint response to Mark Dennis v4.docx <br />Officer Dennis, <br />Thank you for responding to our recent code enforcement for noise nuisance and backyard use violations at the Masonic <br />Lodge. In your letter dated March 31, 2016, you state that that the CUP conditions: <br />"Only slightly addresses outdoor activities," and that <br />"Neither of the ICUP1 conditions prohibit the use of outdoor areas of the Masonic Lodge." <br />We find your statements confusing since they are incorrect. The 1977 documents including the CUP, Design Review, and <br />Staff Report all provide a compelling case, which specifically addresses outdoor activity and prohibits use of the backyard. <br />In addition, we have also provided the City with proof that the Pleasanton Masonic Center (PMC) is now a commercial <br />business after losing its tax - exempt status, non -profit status, and business license, and therefore should not be operating <br />in a residential area. In addition, although the Pleasanton Lodge #321 has a CUP to operate on the premises, the <br />Pleasanton Masonic Center does not have a CUP. Therefore, the PMC and the businesses it manages —the catering <br />company and party business — should not be operating in a residential area. <br />Furthermore, in 2014, the City's own staff report for a similar situation, Young Ivy, also provides evidence to prohibit use <br />of the backyard. <br />Finally, you refer to the Masons' "voluntary measures." These measures are not code and do not supersede a valid CUP, <br />so they carry no weight and have no bearing on a code enforcement action. Furthermore, we did not agree to them. <br />All of these topics are discussed in more detail in the attached letter. If you could please provide responses, we would <br />appreciate it. <br />Thank you, <br />Mike and Darlene Miller <br />Click Isere to report this email as spam. <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.