Laserfiche WebLink
Mark Dennis <br />From: Darlene Miller <br />Sent Tuesday, May 03, 2016 11:44 AM <br />To: Mark Dennis; Adam Weinstein; Gerry Beaudin; Jay Lee <br />Cc: ncalleni greg.oconnor@ herb@ <br />jack.balch@ dnagler@ ; mmiller @i Karla Brown; <br />Kathy Narum <br />Subject Rebuttal to you letter denying Millers' code enforcement at the Masonic Lodge <br />Attachments: Noise complaint response to Mark Dennis v4.docx <br />Officer Dennis, <br />Thank you for responding to our recent code enforcement for noise nuisance and backyard use violations at the Masonic <br />Lodge. In your letter dated March 31, 2016, you state that that the CUP conditions: <br />"Only slightly addresses outdoor activities," and that <br />"Neither of the ICUP1 conditions prohibit the use of outdoor areas of the Masonic Lodge." <br />We find your statements confusing since they are incorrect. The 1977 documents including the CUP, Design Review, and <br />Staff Report all provide a compelling case, which specifically addresses outdoor activity and prohibits use of the backyard. <br />In addition, we have also provided the City with proof that the Pleasanton Masonic Center (PMC) is now a commercial <br />business after losing its tax - exempt status, non -profit status, and business license, and therefore should not be operating <br />in a residential area. In addition, although the Pleasanton Lodge #321 has a CUP to operate on the premises, the <br />Pleasanton Masonic Center does not have a CUP. Therefore, the PMC and the businesses it manages —the catering <br />company and party business — should not be operating in a residential area. <br />Furthermore, in 2014, the City's own staff report for a similar situation, Young Ivy, also provides evidence to prohibit use <br />of the backyard. <br />Finally, you refer to the Masons' "voluntary measures." These measures are not code and do not supersede a valid CUP, <br />so they carry no weight and have no bearing on a code enforcement action. Furthermore, we did not agree to them. <br />All of these topics are discussed in more detail in the attached letter. If you could please provide responses, we would <br />appreciate it. <br />Thank you, <br />Mike and Darlene Miller <br />Click Isere to report this email as spam. <br />1 <br />