06 ATTACHMENT 5 - Laserfiche WebLink

generated from within. This could be done by prohibiting openings on the North or West sides of the structure and, therefore. activity would be focused away from the Northern residences." The staff report dearly gives insight into the intent of the commissioners. That is, that any noise was to be contained within the structure and not create a noise nuisance by using the backyard, and that activity would be focused away from the Northern residences. Having 100 people in the backyard, at a dba greater than 70, violates this. Please respond with your feedback. 1977 design review prohibits use of the backyard The 1977 Design Review states, "The entrance to the building would be on the south side. There would be no windows in the other three elevations and the only other opening would be to emergency exits (one on the east side and the other on the north side). Because the building would be used for Lodge rituals, windows are not desired. Placing the entrance on the south side of the building concentrates outdoor activities as far as possible from the bordering residences. This is In conformance with the requirements of the conditional use permit approval." The design review clearly states to concentrate outdoor activity as far as possible from bordering residences. Having 100 people on the other side of our fence violates concentrating "outdoor activities as far as possible from the bordering residences." Please also note that the sentence "This is in conformance with the requirements of the conditional use permit approval" clearly communicates that "concentrating outdoor activities as far as possible from bordering residences" is in compliance with the CUP. Therefore, 100 people in the backyard, on the other side of our fence line, violate the CUP. Please respond with your feedback. 51 Therefore, when one looks at all of the above 1977 documents in combination, a consistent pattern emerges where the 1977 Planning Commission is protecting the residences from noise generated at the Masons' property: • CUP Condition #l: "...activities were to be focused on the south..." Formatted: Highlight • CUP Condition 1120: "that the applicant provide an effective buffer between the development • Formatted: Highlight and the single family residential area surrounding the property." _ • Hearing Minutes: Commissioner Shepherd requested that some wording be inserted to safeguard the residents from the facllityy by means of buffering Formatted: Highlight • Staff report: "minimize any noise generated from within" Formatted; Highlight • Staff report.: "prohibiting openings on the North or West; sides of the structure" Formatted: Highhght