Laserfiche WebLink
f <br /> APPROACH ! BkF loaf- <br /> YEARS <br /> ENGINEERS.SURVEYORS.PLANNERS <br /> sight distances, lighting, and wayfinding will be provided. <br /> For pedestrian-related issues, roadway crossing distances, crosswalk type, posted and . <br /> 85th percentile speeds, roadway cross-slopes, walkway widths, curb ramp condition, • <br /> refuge island sizes, signal phasing (i.e. permitted or protected), and pedestrian - — .,. ', <br /> countdown timers will also be documented. For bicycle-related issues, shoulder <br /> widths, roadway grades, posted and 85th percentile speeds, vehicular merging and 4 <br /> weaving areas, and bicycle route connectivity will also be documented.The fact _ 1 <br /> sheets will also summarize observed motorist, pedestrian and bicyclist behaviors. The <br /> fact sheets will note high collision locations, applicable design standards and <br /> locations that have non-standard features.The fact sheets will also include observations provided via the bus rider surveys, <br /> as described below. The team will update the pedestrian and bicycle issue maps, and provide summarizing existing <br /> conditions. <br /> Task 2 Deliverables: .- <br /> • Updated CAD plans illustrating recent construction and pedestrian and --•- .4.0 <br /> bicycle facilities <br /> .A <br /> • Memo documenting pedestrian facilities non-compliant with ADA guidelines <br /> • Memo,with map, documenting multimodal collision history "'— <br /> • Pedestrian Issues Map and Pedestrian Issues Fact Sheets -,,: -- <br /> • Bicycle Issues Map and Bicycle Issues Fact Sheets 11 � <br /> Task 3. Develop Initial Recommendations and Design Options <br /> Task 3.1 Review and Confirm Design Standards, Requirements, Guidelines, Planning and Policy Documents <br /> The BKF team will review the existing and applicable material that will form the basis of the development of the proposed <br /> alternatives. These documents and their applicability are summarized below and will be discussed with the City throughout <br /> the assessment of the improvements: <br /> ` -°� • Pleasanton 2010 Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan and Updates <br /> • Pleasanton General Plan <br /> • . • Caltrans Highway Design Manual, Chapter 1000 (Bikeway Planning and Design) <br /> ,, '` , • R.e •y r« • Caltrans Design Information Bulletin (DIB) 82-05 Pedestrian Accessibility <br /> _—= + Guidelines for Highway Projects <br /> • Caltrans Standard Plans 2015, including updates <br /> • Caltrans Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices <br /> "I • AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities:ii_* • ITE's Recommended Design Guidelines to Accommodate Pedestrians and Bicycles <br /> I■7 at Interchanges <br /> AP • NACTO's Urban Bikeway Design Guide <br /> Iry • Americans with Disabilities Act Section 504 <br /> • FHWA Pedestrian and Bicycle Program <br /> The team will meet with the CITY to review design standards and guidelines, and to confirm its approach to developing <br /> short-term, medium-term, and longer-range pedestrian and bicycle improvement options. The team will present the X- <br /> Walk+ tool (developed by team member Fehr & Peers) which can be used to inform the selection of appropriate crossing <br /> City Of Pleasanton l I-.)E3U unu I-GdO Bicycle una i'eclesiriun Overcrossing Iniprofennel IL. <br /> ?LEA SANTi)N. <br />