13 - Laserfiche WebLink

Beaudin: There's a room on the first floor that could be a live/work situation so I think this gets us back to the earlier concept that we were talking about very early in the discussions where you could theoretically have someone with a home office who has the ability to operate there with a pretty small footprint on the ground floor of an office space. Commissioner Balch: So the City allows you to be self-employed or live/work in your residence, but they don't allow you to have employees in a residence, correct? Beaudin: So that's true for Home Occupation, but live/work is a little bit different. We don't have live/work in the Code right now. I think it's something we could certainly explore for downtown when we get into the Downtown Specific Plan effort. In a PUD scenario like this, we have a little bit of flexibility to play with that concept, particularly because we're trying to get this project into an 0 district and I think, if I could just take the opportunity while I have the opportunity—the idea of creating that taller plate height and getting those transom windows in there, what you start to see is the possibility for a space that can evolve with the neighborhood. So we're talking about it in the context of an Office district but we're being mindful of the fact that when we get into this Downtown Specific Plan, the 0 district is likely to evolve to something else. So the kind of design that Tim and Mike are putting forward tonight really is flexible. And so if it evolves to a retail use in the future or to an office, I think it's going to be a pleasant space for this corner. What we're trying to do is get a great design for a corner space that is flexible. Commissioner Balch: Okay, so I apologize then because the staff report talks how they would like offices on the ground floor of all four buildings. Is that still where staff is at? Weinstein: It's a judgment call, right? I think staffs default is to make this project as consistent as possible with the Office district, keeping in mind what Gerry just said, which is that it is possible that the Office district will evolve in the future and that the office space might be better used as retail space. But, we're sort of employing the same principle that we used on the Spring Street project, right? That was a C-C district project which calls for, if you're a strict constructionist of the Downtown Specific Plan, it calls for all ground floor retail space on the Spring Street side. We realized on that site that covering that entire ground floor space with retail was not really practical. It was a really long, narrow lot. So the compromise we came up with was a strong commercial presence right on Spring Street and then whatever you wanted to do in terms of residential on the back and on the upper floors, so we're trying to employ that same principle here on this site. So our suggestion in talking with the applicant earlier was to have the street-fronting buildings have a strong office or maybe retail presence and then do whatever housing you want in the back buildings that are not actually on the streets. So we were trying to employ that same principle that we used on Spring Street to this site to be consistent with the Specific Plan. Commissioner Balch: So slightly different that the written staff report. Weinstein: Again, this is a workshop and we're presenting the project that was proposed but we try to steer applicants to do projects that are consistent with the Specific Plan. Commissioner Balch: Okay, thank you. EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, May 25, 2016 Page 10 of 22