Laserfiche WebLink
ALH Urban & Regional Economics <br />ALH Economics will prepare o comprehensive urban decay impact anolysis of the proposed protect. <br />While socioeconomic effects are not considered significant under CEQA, indirect changes in the <br />environment resulting from such effects should be examined (Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. <br />City of Bakersfield (124 Cal. App. 4th 1 1841). The technical report prepared under Task I, below, will <br />identify and estimate the project's economic impacts and evaluate the potential for urban decay <br />resulting from the Project. The Task 1 report will be included as an appendix in the Final Supplemental <br />EIR, prepared by ESA, and will be the basis of responses to comments related to urban decay. In <br />addition, a Task 2 analysis will be prepared estimating the net fiscal impact of the Project on the City's <br />General Fund, focusing on the anticipated revenues and costs accruing to the General Fund, Task 3 <br />includes involvement in the public process associated with the final approval of the Project's EIR, as <br />requi red. <br />SCOPE OF WORK <br />As noted, ALH Economics will conduct several tasks relevant to urban decoy (including leakage) and <br />fiscal impact analysis of the EDZ (the "Project "). The tasks associated with these analyses and their <br />subtasks are presented below. <br />Task 1: Urban Decay Analysis <br />Task 1.1 Project initiation and OR Coordination. ALH Economics will initiate the urban decoy <br />analysis by reviewing existing materials pertaining to the project and coordinating with ESA regarding <br />key data points, such as project square footage, relevant project opening dotes, trip distribution <br />assumptions, City of Pleasanton population and household estimates and projections, and cumulative <br />projects detail. The purpose of this will be to achieve consistency between the EIR and the urban decoy <br />study. Data required to support the analysis not included in existing materials will be specially <br />requested. <br />Task 1.2. Project Definition. ALH Economics will formulate a working definition of the Project, <br />including both Phase land Full Buildout. This will include anticipated sales upon stabilization and any <br />assumed project opening dates. This information will comprise a fundamental study baseline. ALH <br />Economics will validate the assumption regarding the opening date with ESA prior to proceeding with <br />the subsequent analysis, as this is a critical project benchmark. Based upon project information, ALH <br />Economics will determine the retail and other commercial categories comprising anticipated project <br />soles. All sales figures will be based upon constant dollars and will not reflect the anticipated effects of <br />inflation. The exclusion of an inflation assumption streamlines the analysis, results in more meaningful <br />sales assumptions, and eliminates o potential source of criticism by potential project opponents. <br />Task 1.3. Definition of Market Area. ALH Economics will define ❑ market oreo appropriate for <br />analysis of the project. This market area will be defined as the area from which the majority of retail <br />and other commercial demand for the Project is anticipated to originate. This will be defined through <br />several approaches, including visual observation and data analysis, such as analysis of the distribution <br />pattern of existing and planned general merchandise stores, grocery stores, and hotels, the location of <br />existing and planned dub retail stores within the general region, and retail sales leakage and <br />attraction analysis for Pleasanton and other potential constituent components of the market area. <br />Examination of the area's geography and regional highway system will also contribute to the <br />PAGE ^ <br />