06 - Laserfiche WebLink

1 Ptolecl Deserpton and Approach ltigh- volume roadways and stationary sources. as well as construction equipment. that can cause health risk impacts. Mitigation measures from the General Plan Ellt and /or Gl'A EIR will he revised for their potential lo reduce impacts at the project site. Additional mitigation measures liar aesthetic visual and scenic resources will be identified where necessary to reduce any significant effects. Noise. Project- related noise impacts could arise from the relatively high. but temporary. noise levels from project construction activities and from the long -term increases in traffic volumes. ESA will identify the noise - sensitive land uses or activities in the vicinity of the project site. such as residences across Sloneridge 1)rive. to the south. and roads that would receive motor vehicle traffic generated by project development and assess the difference in noise levels resulting from the change in traffic due to the proposed land use change. Specific tasks will include documenting existing noise levels at the project site by collecting long -term and short-term noise measurements at the project site atxl calculate Ldn or CNEI. average noise levels for the site. based on the noise measurements for comparison 10 Land Use Compatibility standards. losing the Federal 1 Iighway Administration (11 I WA) noise model. the analysis will quantity the increase in noise levels along roadways used to access the project site based on [ratific increases predicted in the 1ransponatkm analysis. 1 SA will rely on mitigation measures identified in the General Plan EIR and /or (TPA EIIt. if necessary. Transportation and Circulation. ESA will Ivan) with Fehr and Peel's (P�l'•P) lo prepare a transportation and circulation analysis lit the LIR. ESA and F&P successfully provided the transportation analysis for the General Pion .lotem a/rn) an(I Raronine Elk. I'&P s proposed scope of work is attached lily the City's review (see Attachment 11. Their analysis will include a rcvicw of the Citywide Traffic Model to ctnure that the parcels are coded correctly. It will also include a traffic analysis that will look at 1 i key intersect ions under Existing. Existing plus Project. l:xisling plus Approved Projects. Existing plus Approved Projects plus Project. Cumulative and Cumulative plus Project.'fhe revised scone of work (see Attachment 2) includes analyzing nine of the key intersection during the Saturday neck hour. The traffic analysis will identify any. intersections that would be impacted under the build out of the proposed Tonine revisions, including an initial cumulative assessment at the intersections that nrovide access to the proiect site. The additional traffic analysis will also nmvide site planning guidance and a vehicle miles travelled assessment. The results of the traffic analysis will he presented in the FIR: a separate traffic study will not be prepared. I'hc additional services scone of work (see Attachment 3) includes costs to update the analysis for the preferred proiect, reevaluate project impacts under each scenario. and conduct a quantitative project analysis for each alternative (or to reduce costs, staff may select to have a qualitative nroiecl alternative analysis conducted). • OtherCEQ.l Enviroaarenral Factor .'Fhe impacts of tltc rezoning 4)11 other C li.QA Iaw ironntentzl factors will he discussed. including technical supporting evidence in the till!. Each topic will address potential impacts and draw on mitigation measures from the General flan [ilk and /or GPA lillt to address potential impacts. As the Economic and Fiscal lilentent of the (icneral flan pre -dates the Climate Action flan. it is assumed that the retuning is accounted for in the modeling that was conduced for the ('Al'. 11) general other issues are anticipated to he (illy analyved briefly. hut in sufficient detail to credibly demonstrate (heir lack of significance tinder CIiQA. assuming this finding can he made. For instance. it appears unlikely that the proposed project will result in any noticeable changes to agricultural resources. cultural resources. biological resources. recreational facilities. mineral resources. or other environmental 1 -4 City oI Pleasanton Johnson Dove Eco.mna Development Zone EIR