06 - Laserfiche WebLink

r 11 Il: S; L 1 Project Descriphon and Approach plan amendment and rezoning Rx the Johnson Drive sire) would likely he the cause of new and /or more severe impacts. should) any he identified. USA will prepare a SE1R including a robust technical analysis of the identified key environmental issues. Based upon the REP. for du purposes or !his proposal ESA assumes That four issues Aesthetics. Air Quality. Noise. and Transportation —will he fully analyzed in the SEIR. with the remainder of the environmental topics on the C'I :QA Checklist assured to he discussed in lesser detail. in a separate section of the document. Mitigation measures from the General Plan 1 :1It and /or GI'A 1:1R will he reviewed for the applicability to (he proposed Johnson Drive project. This revised scope of work includes staff hours to update the SEIR nmjcct description and associated Ieehnical analysis completed to -date with the current project description. As set forth in the RPI'. ESA will provide the City with five (5) copies of the ANA R. as well as one unbound copy and an electronic copy. AI est hetic :c/Light and Glare. The impacts of the rezoning on aesthetic. visual. and scenic resources will he evaluated. including potential loss of views and effects of increased lighting on motorists and residents in the City (and. potentially. residents of Dublin. immediately across Interstate 58(1). Policies and programs provided in the General flan and standard City requirements At ill be evaluated as to their effect of mitigating or avoiding any potentially significant effects. Mitigation measures from the General Plan 1:112 and /or GPA EIl< will he revised for their potential to reduce impacts at the project site. Additional mitigation measures tirr aesthetic. visual and scenic resources will he identified where necessary to reduce any significant effects. Visual Massing Simulations SSA t ill tears t ith Environmental Vision to provide visual massing simulations for the proposed project in support of the Aesthetics analysis. The simulations would he completed from three public viewpoints and reflect belirre and ; filer images or the project site. Air Quality. The air quality analysis till locus on air quality effects primarily from increased traffic. including any identified health risk effects. and will also address cumulative effects relative to oilier reasonably anticipated development. as tell as project consistency with the regional air quality plan. The analysis till discuss the regional and pond air quality setting. ambient air monitoring data. and current air quality management efforts. 'Elie analysis nil) identify the nearest sensitive air pollutant receptors to the rezone area residences across Sloneridge Drive. to the south. and across l -6811. to the west and any major existing sources of air pollutants. including (hose in the inventory data compiled by the Ray Area Air Quality Management Districl (11AA(1M1)). The 13AAQM1)('1XQA Air Quality Guidelines significance criteria with regard to air quality impacts till he relied upon.' '1 he Illt analysis till discuss emissions likely n he generated during construction of subsequent development projects under the /oiling amendment. evaluate the potential for construction dust to cause any lord cxceedances of ambient particulate standards. and estimate 1iuurc criteria air pollutant emissions from vehicular traffic and onside stationary %OOP:CS. The SII1R analysis w ill identify. as feasible. u hat types and size of development would likely he of concern. Further. ESA \\ill address diesel particulate matter (DPIVI). a toxic air contaminant ('1 AC). emitted from .\Ithuw:h IItt It.\ A! t9I 11.tpul n.sn c c I IIOI.r 'cumin .uglnkled It udni_ a dcc uu on Ip the ■ ?Ili lm lu.t SHIN CHIC ( ' ' 4 1 1 , 1 1 Lrnrun WV(' In Ili' Cal llintna 111nId,suz "11"1 . \..ur•aum thee trIICU.r art wlgwtlCd In .ul'.taua :l Ct IJvuic'1 the lints to It \ \I 11.11) . 2009 I lire .hnitt uuJ.law /i. mom. I4 )xu Gry or Pleasanton Johnson Drwe Ecawmc Dote proem ?one E IR 1 -3