My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
06
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
071916
>
06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/29/2016 4:28:00 PM
Creation date
7/13/2016 8:50:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
7/19/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
06
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 projccl Dosuiption and Approach <br />Project Approach <br />13ased on our review oldie Request fire Proposals. we have put together a1 scope of work that we believe <br />responds to the City's objectives. This scope details the tasks that ESA proposes to complete and deliver a <br />Supplemental I IIt Environmental Impact Report (SEIR). which would focus in on three key <br />environmental issue areas. and would he tiered from the 2009 General Ilan 1;IR and the 2011 (;PA E lIt. <br />The City. as lead Agency. may prepare a supplcsnenl to an EIIt if only nlintw additions or changes would <br />be necessary to make the previous I lIt adequately apply to the projccl in the changed situation. hate SI:IR <br />need only present the information necessary to make the previous EIR adequate for the project as revised. <br />Thus. for purposes of the current SLIIt. the project will consist of further amendments 10 the Pleasanton <br />General Plan. previous amendments to which were analyicd in llleā¢ GPA EIIt. <br />The SEAR will be given the sante kind of notice and public review as is given to a i radi i:IR (C EQA <br />Guidelines Section 15(187). and may be circulated by itself without re- circulaling the previous 13rali or <br />Final lilt. flowerer. when the ('ity decides whether lo approve the proposed project. the decision- making <br />body shall consider the previous E:1R as revised by the SINK. A finding under Section 15091 shall he <br />nude for each significant effect shown in the previous FIR as revised. <br />Task 1. Project Initiation and Site Visit <br />In addition to meeting with City staff for a project kick-off meeting. ESA will review the Administrative <br />f)rafk Genera Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment. as provided by the City. and will request data <br />viral Io the project in electronic Iirrnlat. including but not limited to. arty updated information concerning <br />ongoing investigation and remedial ion of contaminated soil and groundwater al the loaner Clorox <br />campus. ESA will begin the environmental and regulatory setting portions ()I' the SEIR, and will inform <br />the City ofaity environmental constraints that arise during that stork that could help to shape (he proposed <br />p i'o,jcct (i.e.. make it a self mitigating project <br />IESA will coordinate a visit for key personnel to the project site and surrounding environs during which <br />time ESA will photograph the site and the surrounding, area to document existing conditions. <br />Task 2. Notice of Preparation (NOP) <br />Although an NOP is not required lire a Supplemental LIR. should the ('ily+ desire In issue one. ESA trill <br />prepare a NOP lire l' view and revision by City staff. The N( hill conlimil to ('LOA (.uirlt'lin s <br />S.ciions 1 5082 and 15375. which require Mat al a minimum. a NO1' include a pro,jeci description. a <br />location reap. and a summary of the potential environmental effects ol'Ihc proiccl. ESA will lik the NOP <br />with the State C'iearinghouse. and provide three hard copies to the City and digital copies. Comments <br />received on the NOP will be taken into consideration in determining w hich topics 10 analyze in the SEIR. <br />Task 3. Administrative Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) <br />The analysis in the S1 Ill will cvattualle the effects of the project compared to an existing baseline (l) be <br />established. general!). at the time a NOP is issued for the SINK). Because this document will supplement <br />the previous!) prepared. the analysis will evaluate whether implementation ()idle Johnson i)rivc <br />Economic Development Zone would result in any new or substantially more severe impacts than those <br />identified in the prior(iencral flan and (IPA flits. whether due to changes in the project. changes in <br />circumstances. of the availability of I11.'w' lint /11111111011. Because the previous Flits particularly. the (CPA <br />1111 are relatively recent. we anticipate th.ii changes to the project (i.e.. implementation of the genera) <br />1 -2 <br />C ty f r Pleasanton Johnsen Owe E eonoque Development Z0110 Elk' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.