CCMIN051716 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mr. Thurman responded to questions from Council regarding the anticipated start of construction, expediting the BART service center, landscaping options, and water- and energy-saving measures. Mayor Thome closed the public hearing. Members of Council commented positively on the project including the BART service center, connectivity, new jobs, energy-saving measures and the collaboration of all parties involved. MOTION: It was m/s by Pentin/Narum to waive first reading and introduce Ordinance No. 2146 approving the application of Workday Inc. for Planned Unit Development Major Modifications to construct a six-story, approximately 410,000-square-foot office building, parking garage, and related site improvements at 6110 and 6120-6160 Stoneridge Mall Road. The proposed modifications would replace the previously-approved plans to construct a six-story, approximately 430,000-square-foot office building, two parking garages, and related site improvements. Motion passed by the following vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Brown, Narum, Olson, Pentin, Mayor Thorne Noes: None Absent: None 16. Approve the plans and specifications and approve various construction agreements including those with Ghilotti Construction Company, Inc., Carlson Management, Inc., Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., and Geocon for the construction of Stanley Boulevard Reconstruction and Undergrounding Utility District, CIP No. 055022 Director of Engineering Steve Kirkpatrick provided the staff report including a summary of plans and specifications, a history of the project, funding sources and contract amounts for the construction agreements as listed in the item description, and recommendations. City Engineer Adam Nelkie provided a project overview and addressed parking, street trees, drought- tolerant landscaping, street lights, sewer main extension, storm drain lines, drainage inlets, utility undergrounding, joint trench in street and termination at homes, and the construction team. He provided information regarding what to expect during construction, a tentative schedule and public outreach. Discussion followed regarding engineering estimates, initial errors in the Kimley-Horn estimates and concerns regarding using Kimley-Horn for this project. It was noted that it makes sense to continue using Kimley-Horn because of the work they have already done on this project. Ensuing discussion pertained to differences in the way the City is dealing with sewer laterals in connection with this project and what occurred with the annexation of Happy Valley. It was noted that some properties will have incremental benefits in relation to others. The City will be extending the lines to the property lines and when property owners decide to connect to the sewer, they will pay connection, capacity and other related fees. Discussion followed regarding property owners who benefit from the improvements and charging a pro- rated fee for the laterals for those who decide later on to connect to the City's system. Staff will look further into the matter and return to Council with additional recommendations. Staff explained distinctions between rate payers and non-rate payers. City Council Minutes Page 5 of 7 May 17,2016