Laserfiche WebLink
proposed homes. The elevation plans did not identify specific exterior materials; in discussion <br /> with the applicant and project architect, the exterior materials for the proposed homes would <br /> be similar to the recently approved homes in the Silver Oaks Hillside development. In general, <br /> staff finds that the proposed homes would conform to the VACSP. Figure 5 shows the <br /> proposed front elevations of the homes. <br /> Figure 5: Front Elevations <br /> i <br /> Lot 9 — Front Elevation <br /> E ii,ih S r %:1.'e c ;! r r , <br /> 1 I !I <br /> -S..- • �J I, . ' r III. .1 ' I t c .1 <br /> Cla.— .— <br /> 1 fr'ea.,—.d"u1 7 <br /> . Yy -{. A <br /> T k~I i <br /> i:1 e r 1.0..1., r iJ 'it <br /> } o eI <br /> , ,,,' i Y <br /> Lot 2 — Front Elevation <br /> vet .P Cii y. -0.4,-...h.., <br /> 5 e yl�''�'}..Y <br /> Main ff �� r r AIt � T rClSI s. 1 . .,r .. <br /> • **111.4. 1: 0Ilw !,Jijr rI Yr.M AI:MUM;I ♦t <br /> � I > <br /> lath <br /> Y ' . la r, i <br /> Arborist Report <br /> An arborist report states that of the 16 surveyed trees within and near the proposed <br /> development area, Tree No. 7, a 33-inch diameter valley oak located on Lot 2, has a significant <br /> crack at the lower trunk fork. For safety reasons, the arborist is recommending its removal. <br /> Staff disagrees with this recommendation. Based on the proposed site plan, this tree is <br /> located in the open space area, and not near the proposed home site; thus, it should be <br /> retained to provide valuable wildlife habitat and allow it to die naturally as it provides valuable <br /> Case No. PUD-116, 88 Silver Oaks Court Planning Commission <br /> Page 11 of 16 <br />