My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
06
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
060716
>
06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2016 11:38:04 AM
Creation date
6/1/2016 9:41:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/7/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
06
Document Relationships
06 ATTACHMENT 3
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\060716
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Building Height. The VACSP allows primary buildings in the HR District to be two stories and <br /> 30 feet in height below elevations of 540 feet. Above that elevation, buildings are limited to <br /> one story and 25 feet in height. The proposed home on Lot 2, which would be located below <br /> 540 feet, is a 29-foot tall, two-story home, meeting the requirements. <br /> The proposed 28-foot 4-inch tall, two-story home on Lot 1 would be located above an elevation <br /> of 540 feet and does not meet the height and story requirements. <br /> The VACSP states that flexibility in applying site development standards such as building <br /> height may be granted to allow for unusual site conditions as long as any new standards are <br /> consistent with the intent of the Specific Plan. It further indicates that minor variations in lot <br /> size, building setbacks, and building height may be permitted subject to the PUD development <br /> plan approval process where necessary due to physical site conditions. As proposed, the <br /> second floor of Lot 1 is significantly smaller than the first floor. Additionally, the proposed <br /> home would not be visible from nearby streets but would be visible from the rear yard of <br /> private homes. The photosimulations prepared for the project, using the view from the rear <br /> yard of 2832 Gray Fox Court, show that the second story of Lot 1 would not substantially <br /> increase the visibility of that residence. The photosimulations for both homes are part of Exhibit <br /> B. <br /> Staff recommends a condition prohibiting additions on the second floor of Lot 1 to minimize <br /> any changes to the Lot 1 residence that would increase its prominence. Additionally, staff <br /> recommends a condition clarifying that building height for both lots is measured vertically from <br /> the lowest finished grade adjacent to an exterior wall of the house to the highest point of the <br /> house, excluding chimneys. The applicant agrees with these conditions. <br /> Architecture Styles. The Specific Hillside Residential District Design Guidelines of the VACSP <br /> states the following: <br /> a House designs should be limited to traditional architectural styles and forms adjusted to <br /> conform to the natural character of the site. <br /> o Architectural design should emphasize the blending of buildings into the natural <br /> surroundings and minimizing building visibility from off-site areas. <br /> o Medium to dark earth-tone building colors shall be used to complement the surrounding <br /> natural setting. Darker colors will generally be less conspicuous when viewed from a <br /> distance. White, tan, light gray, blue, and yellow are inappropriate building base colors. <br /> The proposed two-story homes are designed with articulated wall lines that provide a break in <br /> the massing of the home and promote visual interest. The roof lines vary to help mitigate the <br /> massing of the structure and the front facade of the home on Lot 2 incorporates stone veneer <br /> and stucco. As proposed, the massing of both buildings will be compatible with others in the <br /> area. The home on Lot 1 includes a Juliet-style balcony and the home on Lot 2 includes a <br /> balcony on the front elevation. The window shutters on both homes would add architectural <br /> interest and the home designs incorporate high quality materials and elements. The front entry <br /> and sectional garage doors for both homes are detailed and compatible with the design of the <br /> Case No. PUD-116, 88 Silver Oaks Court Planning Commission <br /> Page 10 of 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.