21 ATTACHMENT 6 AND 7 - Laserfiche WebLink

Engineering Divisions. The site is not located within an Alquist - Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone. The flood hazard maps of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) indicate that the proposed residential development on the subject site is not located in a flood hazard zone. 5. Whether streets, buildings, and other manmade structures have been designed and located in such manner to complement the natural terrain and landscape: The project site is in a developed area of the City. The proposed homes will be compatible in size and scale with the existing homes in the neighborhood. The arborist report prepared for the proposed development surveyed a total of 239 trees and recommends the removal of all except for 16 trees that are located on the creek bank. Staff has included a condition requiring the payment into the City's Urban Forestry Fund to mitigate the removal of the trees. 6. Whether adequate public safety measures have been incorporated into the design of the proposed development plan: Two public streets would provide access to and from the site. The existing Lynn Drive and Rose Avenue would be extended to connect the proposed development with the existing residential neighborhoods. The new homes would be equipped with automatic residential fire sprinklers. The homes would be required to meet the requirements of applicable City codes, and State of California energy and accessibility requirements. 7. Whether the proposed development plan conforms to the purposes of the PUD District: The proposed PUD development plan conforms to the purposes of the PUD district. One of these purposes is to allow for creative design of projects that takes into account site constraints. The proposed project would help to implement the purposes of the PUD ordinance. Through the PUD process the proposed project has provided the applicant and the City with a development plan that optimizes the use of this site in a reasonably sensitive manner. PUBLIC COMMENT A sewer lift station was originally proposed as part of the project. Roselyn Homeowners Association (RHOA) questioned the ownership and location of the lift station, and raised concerns regarding the funding of the lift station. The RHOA also commented on the proposed outfall into the creek and creek bank maintenance, vehicles speeding on Rose Avenue, use of well water for irrigation, and house design. The proposal has PUD -99 14 Planning Commission