My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
21 ATTACHMENT 6 AND 7
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
041916
>
21 ATTACHMENT 6 AND 7
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2016 2:23:34 PM
Creation date
4/14/2016 4:02:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
4/19/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
21
Document Relationships
21
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\041916
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
intersections in the area. The structures would be designed to meet the <br />requirements of the California Building Code, California Fire Code, and other <br />applicable City codes. The proposed development is compatible with the <br />adjacent uses and would be generally consistent with the existing scale and <br />character of the area. Adequate setbacks would be provided between the new <br />dwellings and the existing structures on the adjacent properties. Therefore, the <br />proposed PUD development plan is in the best interests of the public health, <br />safety, and general welfare. <br />2. Whether the proposed development plan is consistent with the Pleasanton <br />General Plan and applicable specific plan: <br />The proposed development includes the removal of the existing residence and <br />accessory buildings and construction of a total of 19 new residential lots on an <br />approximately 9.02 -acre site. The proposed density of 2.7 dwelling units per <br />acre conforms to the General Plan density range for the Medium Density <br />Residential land use designation. The proposed project would further General <br />Plan Programs and Policies encouraging new housing to be developed in infill <br />areas that are adjacent to existing residential developments. Thus, the proposed <br />development plan is consistent with the City's General Plan. <br />3. Whether the proposed development plan is compatible with the previously <br />developed properties in the vicinity and the natural, topographic features of <br />the site: <br />Surrounding properties include single - family homes, Alameda County <br />Fairgrounds, and an arroyo. As conditioned, staff believes that the proposed <br />residential lots and homes would be compatible with the surrounding uses, as the <br />basic site layout and architecture would not be substantially different from that of <br />surrounding neighborhoods. The subject property has relatively flat terrain <br />except for the creek bank on the north side. Grading of the lots has been limited <br />to the creation of pads for the future homes and to achieve the proper functioning <br />of utilities and the creek bank on the north side of the project site. Therefore, the <br />PUD development plan is compatible with previously developed properties and <br />the natural, topographic features of the site. <br />4. Whether grading in conjunction with the proposed development plan takes <br />into account environmental characteristics and is designed in keeping with <br />the best engineering practices to avoid erosion, slides, or flooding, and to <br />have as minimal an effect upon the environment as possible: <br />As described above, the site would be graded to create the needed building pad <br />areas. Erosion control and dust suppression measures will be documented in <br />the improvement plans and will be administered by the City's Building and <br />PUD -99 <br />13 <br />Planning Commission <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.