Laserfiche WebLink
circumstances have been identified, per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) <br />Guidelines Section 15162 that would require supplemental environmental review. <br />Therefore, no supplemental environmental document accompanies this report. <br />CONCLUSION <br />The proposed PUD development plan conforms to the General Plan and zoning <br />designations. The proposed homes have adequate setbacks and architecture of the <br />homes is compatible with the existing homes in the vicinity and is appropriate for the <br />subject site. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the applications. <br />Submitted by: <br />Ger Beaudin <br />Director of Community <br />Development <br />F �R ^eview: <br />i' 1/ " \ <br />Tina Olson <br />Director of Finance <br />Approved y: <br />OL-1� <br />Nelson Fialho <br />City Manager <br />Attachments: <br />1. Draft City Council Ordinance for PUD Development Plan (PUD -115) with Exhibit <br />A, Recommended Conditions of Approval <br />2. Draft City Council Resolution approving the Growth Management Agreement <br />3. Proposed Development Plans and Initial Study /Negative Declaration for PUD-44 <br />The following items are available upon request. <br />• Geotechnical Investigation Report by Nicholas Engineering Consultants <br />• Health Risk Assessment Memorandum by Deduk <br />• Tree Report by HortScience, Inc. <br />• Noise Assessment Study by Edward Pack Associates, Inc. <br />• Green Point Checklist <br />• Biological Assessment Study by Olberding Environmental, Inc. <br />4. March 9, 2016 Planning Commission Meeting Report (without attachments) and <br />excerpts of the March 9, 2016 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes <br />5. Location and Noticing Map <br />Page 6 of 6 <br />