My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
20
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
041916
>
20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2016 1:53:53 PM
Creation date
4/13/2016 2:33:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
4/19/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
20
Document Relationships
20 ATTACHMENT 3
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\041916
20 ATTACHMENT 3-2
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\041916
20 ATTACHMENT 4
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\041916
20 ATTACHMENT 4-2
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\041916
20 ATTACHMENT 5
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\041916
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The proposed homes are designed in a Craftsman style. The home on Lot 1 would be <br />one story and approximately 3,704 square feet in area. The home on Lot 3 would be <br />two stories and approximately 4,503 square feet in area. Both homes would have <br />attached three -car garages with driveways accommodating additional parking. The <br />proposed landscape comprises a variety of trees, shrubs and groundcover that would <br />be planted around the new homes. <br />Please refer to the Planning Commission staff report (Attachment 4) for a detailed <br />project description. <br />DISCUSSION <br />The Planning Commission staff report (Attachment 4) provides additional background <br />information and a detailed discussion of the proposed project, including General Plan <br />and zoning consistency, project development standards, architectural design, tree <br />removal and replacement, and considerations related to biological resources, noise and <br />air quality. Key elements of the analysis are summarized below. <br />General Plan and Zoninq <br />The subject property is designated by the Land Use Element of the Pleasanton General <br />Plan for Low Density Residential land uses ( <2.0 dwelling units /acre) with a mid -point <br />density of 1.0 dwelling unit/acre. The proposed development would have a density <br />equivalent to one dwelling unit per acre, conforming to the General Plan Land Use <br />density requirements. The current zoning for the project site is Planned Unit <br />Development — Low Density Residential (PUD -LDR) District. The proposed <br />development conforms to the current zoning and no rezoning is required. <br />Development Standards and Architecture <br />The proposed site development standards, i.e. minimum setbacks, maximum building <br />height, and maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) are similar to those of the surrounding <br />residential developments. The proposed Craftsman style of architecture, i.e., <br />architectural details, building materials, and color palettes, would allow the new homes <br />to blend in with their surroundings, and be compatible with the style of homes found in <br />the surrounding neighborhoods. Overall, the design of the homes would complement <br />the semi -rural character of Dublin Canyon Road. <br />With the proposed development limit lines on Lots 2 and 3, the southernmost portion of <br />the site, which contains the steep slope and mature trees, would not be developed and <br />would be preserved as open space. <br />Tree Removal and Replacement <br />The arborist report recommended the removal of four trees due to the proposed grading <br />and construction of the private driveway /street. The proposed landscape plan shows <br />the planting of 19 trees comprising five different species, and a mix of shrubs and <br />groundcovers. No turf/lawn is proposed. The Planning Commission recommended <br />increasing the size of the trees planted near Dublin Canyon Road to better screen the <br />proposed development from the street. Overall, the proposed landscape would retain <br />the existing rural character of the area. <br />Page 4 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.