CCMIN121515 - Laserfiche WebLink

In response to Councilmember Narum's inquiry as to which lots would be removed, staff stated lots thirty-four (34) to thirty-eight (38). In response to Councilmember Narum, it was affirmed that they will not build on lots twenty-nine (29) and thirty (30) where the road would punch through. There was consensus by staff that this area is man made. Mayor Thorne made a motion to eliminate lots thirty four (34) through thirty-eight (38), make lot 32 Measure PP compliant or move it to the end of the cul-de-sac, direct staff to move the lot down below five hundred (500) feet and move the access to Lund Ranch Road to the last cul-de-sac. Councilmember Olson seconded the motion. Staff stated that five (5) lots would be reduced from the nineteen (19) units that are currently proposed to be existing out of Lund Ranch, with the access to Lund Ranch Road to the end of the cul-de-sac. There will only be twelve (12) lots exiting out of Lund Ranch Road. Councilmember Brown expressed concerns about supporting the proposed location of the access road and wants to be consistent with existing guidelines. She believes this is a ten (10) unit plan. She would prefer a continuance on this item so that a proposal could be considered by the Sycamore Heights Homeowners Association to allow access across their property. Councilmember Brown wanted to go on record with her belief that referendums are about people standing up for their communities and wished the Homeowners Association had time to work on a different solution. At this time she cannot support the motion. Councilmember Narum stated that there was some ability to inpret, but it has to be consistent. Her understanding of the motion is that construction cannot be conducted on slopes greater than twenty- five (25%) percent. Discussion ensued among the-Council regarding man made versus natural slopes and compliance with Measure PP. There was consensus to move lot thirty-two (32) below five hundred (500) feet and not build pads on slopes greater than twenty-five (25%) percent. Staff noted that this would involve a significant alteration to the ordinance and would require reintroduction. The Council could then approve the ordinance at an adjourned regular meeting on January 5, 2016. MOTION: It was m/s by Thorne/Olson to reintroduce and waive first reading of Ordinance No. 2133 approving the application of Greenbriar Homes Communities for Planned Unit Development (PUD) Rezoning and Development Plan approval, as filed under Case PUD-25. Motion passed by the following vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Narum, Olson, Mayor Thorne Noes: Councilmember Brown Absent: Councilmember Pentin 23. Pulled from the Consent Calendar and moved to the regular agenda — Second reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 2134 approving a Development Agreement between the City of Pleasanton and Greenbriar Homes Communities The City Attorney suggested reintroducing the ordinance to reflect the changes made to the Planned Unit Development Plan in Item 22. This item will be brought back for final consideration and adoption at the January 5, 2016 adjourned regular meeting City Council Minutes Page 14 of 15• December 15, 2015