RES 15811 - Laserfiche WebLink

TABLE 1. MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM • Implementation. Monitoring Monitoring and Monitoring Verificatiorr,of Mitigation Measures Procedures' Responsibility Reporting Action Schedule Compliance Mitigation Measure 4.3-5: The proposed project would Project applicant Community Review and Prior to issuance Verified by: impact approximately 0.022 acre of Waters of the United shall hire a qualified Development approve a of grading or States(0.016 acre and 243 lineal feet of drainage wetlands biologist Department; qualified wetlands building permit, channel waters, and 0.006 acre of in-channel wetlands). approved by the City Planning Division biologist and whichever is The connection to Sunset Creek Lane would require of Pleasanton who wetland restoration sooner. approximately 100 linear feet(400 square feet)of will prepare a plan plan Date: additional impact. While compensation for impacts to for creation of Review monitoring Waters of the United States shall occur at a minimum of appropriate Verify inclusion of reports for a 1:1 replacement ratio, the CDFW and RWQCB replacement all permit-required wetland generally require a replacement ratio of 2.1 or better. To wetlands that measures in restoration sites the degree possible,the applicant shall replace lost adheres to all applicable for a minimum of wetland resources in kind. Thus, the project would specifications in this construction plans five years and create at least 343 feet of channel (1:1 ratio)and 0.031 measure and will and specifications. verify that acres of waters of the US (seasonal drainage channel), verify in writing that Inspect site during required of which would be at least 0.006 acres of seasonal the plan adheres to construction to monitoring reports wetlands on the Lund Ranch property. Creation of new all guidance that is ensure compliance have been channels can be logistically difficult as there are finite applicable to the with project submitted to areas within a site to accomplish this type of mitigation. project, including construction plans. Responsible Therefore, some mitigation for the seasonal channel conditions imposed Agencies. may have to be out-of-kind.This could be accomplished as part of all by creating additional seasonal wetlands. The creation Responsible Agency of not less than 0.031 acre of wetland and/or seasonal permits needed for channel would be required. this work. The site supports sufficient opportunities to accommodate creation of wetland habitat. Even if the project could not create 343 feet of channel,there are a number of areas along Drainage Areas A and B and within the non-jurisdictional drainage swales on the site that could easily accommodate this type of creation mitigation. The goal of this mitigation should be to create new wetlands and enhance existing wetlands in a way that replaces the functions and values of the wetlands that are proposed to be filled. A qualified biologist should develop a restoration plan that identifies the full extent of the impact, location of suitable sites to create or enhance wetlands of the necessary acreage,and develop success criteria specific to the actual wetland • creation design. The mitigation site should be monitored for at least five years.A detailed wetland restoration plan should be developed for this mitigation area during the regulatory permitting phase of the project.The plan will be subject to the review and approval of the USAGE, RWQCB, CDFG and the City of Pleasanton. This plan should incorporate additional studies and details, 6 fo-115 JUNE 2015 ® Type and acreage of wetland to be impacted and goals for wetland creation - n....,:u 4 ......_. _s„_:i ....a..L:i:...t..-.....,u....4