CCMIN120115 - Laserfiche WebLink

Councilmember Narum noted she believed that would be included the next phase of a motion as she believes those things needed to be addressed for both of the neighborhoods separate from this application and include them in the Council's work plan now. In summary Councilmember Narum supported the motion but felt a little uncomfortable about the split and the promises made to the Ventana Hills residents. Part of her says it should be closer to the 10 to 12, but in looking at this you know it is not necessarily the best layout so she is going support the motion. She agrees with Mayor Thorne that the Council needs to move this project along as there are a lot other things that the council needs to be doing the business of the City and the people, and this has become all-encompassing for the last couple of months. Councilmember Brown thanked the previous council members for coming out and congratulated the current council which she knows are going to disagree on this vote. She noted every member of this Council including Councilmember Pentin did the research, met with the residents, walked the hills and met with the developer many times. The Council really took this to heart that this was very important to our residents and struggled with the difficult decision they were going to have to make. She appreciated all that the council does even though she was going to disagree with them. She noted she was an author and signature collector for Measure PP and believes it was true that there is some split but that it was very clear in her mind when she collected signatures for Measure PP that it was protecting the hills and that nothing should be in the top 100 feet of a ridge. She noted the discussion about whether a water tank should be there because we need water tanks for City development and many members of the collecting group said no, we want pristine ridgelines so that's why she is taking a conservative view if you want to look at it that way. That if it's a 25% slope, leave it alone. If it's within 100 feet of a ridge, leave it alone, if it's meant to be protected. Pleasanton has very few ridges left in our town. The ones we have are precious so destroying them or carving them and cutting them up doesn't seem the right thing to do by building a road or structure or anything else. Measure PP was a modification of the General Plan. The General Plan is referred as the constitution of Pleasanton's planned progress and it does not feel to me that this is progress. Cutting through two neighborhoods no matter which way you go to get to a development site doesn't sound like a good plan from the beginning. Regardless if you put 10 homes there, 50 homes or 150 homes she would really like to see this be the last project that you cut through one neighborhood and then through another one to get to a the subject project. The only exemption in Measure PP is 10 units and when we try to bend the terminology of what is a ridge, or what is a slope, is it natural or was it that way before, it looks like we're trying to find a loophole. Cut and fill whether you haul it off or you don't haul it off in this case it takes 645 truckloads of dirt to build this road, this does not seem like protecting a ridgeline or a hillside to her. Councilmember Brown wanted to make clear one clarification from the City Attorney that there is a way to call this a one off, an exception, for a grading and changing of a hillside to not set a precedent for future projects and requested the City Attorney make it a matter of record for them. City Attorney Lowell noted as he understood her point, that Councilmember Brown was saying that this would not apply to future projects and that the Council was going to evaluate future projects based upon their own merits and here you are saying that the impact upon the hillside is unique to this situation only. Mr. Lowell stated the council can do that, but on future actions he believes the council will need to look very carefully at this action and make sure that you can articulate very clearly why you may find differently in the future. He believes it is very important that the council seeks to act consistently and that they harmonize your interpretations of the general plan and actions and he believes in most cases they can do that, but it's something that they need to keep in mind. City Council Minutes Page 12 of 16 December 1, 2015