CCMIN120115 - Laserfiche WebLink

City Attorney Lowell requested staff to clarify that the motion included Certifying the EIR and the modifications or minor changes staff had provided previously to the approval documents and that those amendments would be included as well. Councilmember Olson agreed. City Attorney Lowell confirmed the council was approving staff recommendation as amended by the motion. Councilmember Olson agreed. Councilmember Narum acknowledged the dedication and efforts of everyone present and to those that have sent emails or contributed to the dialogue and what was the intent. She thanked the Planning Commission as they spent a lot of their time and effort in trying to reach some kind of decision regardless of whether or not the Council agreed with it. She believes she has always tried to look and find the solutions where people generally left only half happy and felt she has done her job. She acknowledged that there's difference of opinion and those that she has talked with know that she struggled with this decision and there doesn't appear to be any kind of clear path forward that will make everyone happy She noted promises made by earlier Council members that were made to one neighborhood, the CCR's for the other neighborhood, the overlay of Measure PP and what that meant and she believes it clouds the current council a little. She noted when you look at Measure PP it was very clear in the voter document by the former City Attorney that there was going to need to be some clarifications made and specifically with structures and ridgelines. You know you look at this and the signers of Measure PP don't all agree. We've got two neighborhoods and their interpretation of Measure PP I have found is different. She noted that the Council not agreeing is also not surprising. As a Council it's a tough thing. She felt she started to back up and look and consider they really think the goal and intent of Measure PP was by the voters and it's pretty clear to her that they were looking to preserve the hillsides and the ridgelines and in creating the view of the hills from down below as well as creating open space. The rally cry around it was "save our hills" and as she said last time and I think the Mayor said the fact is that this application would look a lot different if it was not for Measure PP as it has done a number of things here that are positive for the community ranging from being down to 48 homes versus a number from somewhere over a hundred at one time. The houses will be down in a bowl and will be hardly visible from the flat land of Pleasanton, which is what we want. She stated that this latest road is shorter and it reduces the grading and it saves a number of Heritage trees which she believes is just as important. It separates the trail from the road and so the bottom line is on this project the houses are down low, the ridge, that land, that beautiful land up above is going to be protected and owned by the City and we're going to get a community benefit here of 160 acres, with trails and open space, in perpetuity, which is a fabulous. She noted the last time she indicated she continued to favor access and favored access from both neighborhoods and she continues to believe that is the right thing to do for a couple of reasons. She thinks that there should be access or the ability to access this open space coming from two different directions and she thinks that the fire, safety and the EVA road and believes having a little bit of the road in there for fire engines and police cars are a positive particularly when you're looking up that hill now and see the nice lovely brown grass without any water. A couple of things that this project has really brought forward for her or made her aware of was this cut-through traffic from Bernal through Independence and that whole neighborhood. However, on the other side she believes there is uncertainty about the bypass road as to when it will happen and what the impacts will be. City Council Minutes Page 11 of 16 December 1,2015