My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN102015
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
CCMIN102015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2015 3:27:41 PM
Creation date
11/19/2015 3:27:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
10/20/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN102015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
She discussed the reasons focus group are held and said this year they wanted to explore more data <br /> about broad brand and cellular connectivity. Focus group information is outlined in the staff report and <br /> perceptions and sentiments have changed to be more positive. She provided questions asked of the <br /> focus group and they take the information and feedback and applied it to the survey instrument to <br /> determine what questions are still valid and what needs to be changed a bit for questions which are no <br /> longer relevant. <br /> Regarding the telephone survey overall satisfaction is 9 in 10 Pleasanton businesses report being <br /> happy with their location, which was similar as seen in 2012. The businesses particularly cited the <br /> City's positive environment, convenient location and friendly people and customers. 92% of the <br /> business respondents were confident they would remain in Pleasanton for the next 2 years or beyond. <br /> Regarding more of the specific questions, they tested respondents for assessment of Pleasanton's <br /> location for attracting and retaining employees, attracting and retaining customers and vendors and <br /> finding appropriate business space. Results are listed in the survey report and she shared the <br /> significant differences between the 2012 and 2015 survey which she displayed on the chart. It related <br /> to attracting qualified employees, retaining qualified employees and finding appropriate business space. <br /> She would suggest that this is a reflection of the improving economy. Employees are difficult to find and <br /> business space is affected due to lack of vacancies. <br /> Survey respondents were asked about their evaluations of Pleasanton's infrastructure such as roads, <br /> telecommunication services, public transportation options, electric, water and sewer services, and <br /> significant differences were found in responses of how the City was doing in the public transportation <br /> realm, which was also identified in 2012. As much as it was statistically valid, she would not consider <br /> this an important difference to focus on. She said Pleasanton is one of few communities that boast as <br /> much public transportation as they do with 2 BART stations, an Ace Train Station, and an active bus <br /> system. This will be taken under advisement. <br /> Regarding assessment of amenities, they asked about public schools, recreational activities, <br /> restaurants, entertainment options and community events. As heard in 2012, all of the areas tested <br /> were rated above good except for entertainment options. They then asked about the importance of <br /> selected services the City provides such as public safety, community beautification, property <br /> appearance standards and permit processing and business recruitment. They rated all of those things <br /> as between somewhat important and very important. They were tested and asked how the City was <br /> doing in delivering these services. By far, public safety was rated as most important and in how that is <br /> being provided. <br /> The two areas below a rating of good were permit processing and business recruitment. Relative to <br /> business recruitment, they attribute this sentiment of an interest to buy small businesses and attracting <br /> more small businesses to the community. Focus group participants talked about appreciating the <br /> diversity of businesses but wanting to make sure they retained the opportunities for small businesses <br /> so they maintain the "hometown" feel of the City. <br /> Regarding the permitting process, the City has talked about streamlining and in testing, they asked for <br /> their evaluation of City staff. All responses were above good, so clearly staff works well and this can be <br /> raised. They asked respondents about the ease of the process, and 63% said the process was either <br /> very easy or somewhat easy, which is an increase of 12% over the 2012 survey. This speaks well to <br /> the City's efforts and high standards. Generally, people were asked about their evaluation of staff that <br /> was not part of the permitting process and rate staff on courteousness, helpfulness, and fairness and <br /> responsive to needs and all were above the rating of good. <br /> Moving to the importance of internet, broadband and cell phone service, they wanted to have some <br /> hard data points. As she looked to bring forward an infrastructure assessment, they tested the survey <br /> respondents for reliable internet service, high speed internet service and reliable cell phone service. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 4 of 9 October 20,2015 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.