My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11 ATTACHMENTS 9 -16
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
110315
>
11 ATTACHMENTS 9 -16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/28/2015 3:38:00 PM
Creation date
10/14/2015 3:54:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
11/3/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
11 ATTACHMENTS 9-16
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
270
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
they concur with the report's findings, and with the developer, that the Lund Ranch <br /> Road access is the preferred environmental approach to minimize impacts and avoid <br /> construction on high sloping ground. <br /> However, it has come to our attention that the City of Pleasanton administration is <br /> proposing to overrule, and deviate from, the EIR and attempt to push a second road <br /> through the steep-sloped ground. This additional road is not the environmentally <br /> preferred solution, and it will also likely to run afoul of the Measure PP, which voters <br /> approved for the purpose of preventing the environmental damage and steep-s loped <br /> terrain. <br /> It is therefore our earnest request that the City administrators use the EIR as the <br /> impartial planning tool and implement the E/R's preferred project configuration with <br /> the lower impact road that does not violate Measure PP. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Rebecca Evans, Chapter Chair <br /> Sierra Club San Francisco Bay Chapter. <br /> Tim LaBarge stated that he is speaking on behalf of my wife, Vicki LaBarge, and read <br /> her notes as follows: <br /> "Junipero will take on an additional 500 plus cars a day on top of the 2,400 that <br /> already commute up and down our street. These are numbers that have been <br /> validated by traffic control, as they've been monitoring traffic over the last couple of <br /> years. As a matter of fact, there is no thought given to the additional cut-through <br /> traffic that will happen even if it had been about the Traffic Commission once the <br /> 350 apartments go up on the corner of Bernal and Stanley which are under <br /> construction at this point. I'm certain there will be mom cut-through traffic associated <br /> with those apartment complexes." <br /> "The future development has always been planned via exit Sycamore, hence the <br /> signage and existence of the fire hydrant sitting in the middle of the field where a <br /> future road extension off Sycamore Creek will exist. Homeowners in Sycamore <br /> Creek and Sunset Creek have always been aware since the purchase of their <br /> homes, unlike Junipero homeowners who had no idea that parkland would force <br /> traffic down our street. The road was always intended to go through them. Change <br /> is okay, but when it is forced on one neighborhood, that is simply not okay. We're <br /> feeling the brunt of all the development going in behind us obviously" <br /> `The developer can and should figure out a plan to exit via Sycamore Creek and <br /> Sunset Creek which avoids 25-percent slopes. There is a way. It is the developer's <br /> job how to build within the confines of the conditions that the Planning Commission <br /> dictates. It is possible that the slope connecting Sunset Creek is not 25 feet. <br /> Environmental impact by the developer questioned the homes that cross creek beds <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 26, 2015 Page 16 of 26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.