Laserfiche WebLink
Growth Management <br /> The City's Growth Management Program (GMP) allows a total of 235 growth <br /> management unit allocations to be issued within a calendar year for new residential <br /> units. The GMP requires all new residential projects to obtain Growth Management Unit <br /> Allocations (GMUAs) for each residential unit to be constructed. To date in 2015, a total <br /> of eight GMUAs have been issued, and there are an additional 13 GMUAs requested <br /> and requiring Council's approval. The proposed development would require 25 <br /> GMUAs. If the Council approves the 13 pending GMUAs and the 25 requested <br /> GMUAs, a total of 46 GMUAs would be issued to-date this calendar year, well below the <br /> allocation limit. <br /> The Growth Management Agreement for the project is included with Attachment 6. <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION <br /> The Planning Commission held a public hearing on August 12, 2015, to review the <br /> proposed project. The minutes of this meeting are provided in Attachment 8. Although <br /> there was disagreement among some of the Commissioners, the Commissioners <br /> generally agreed that the project should be modified to: <br /> 1) reduce the overall residential density or building footprint to allow for the <br /> development of an open space amenity; and <br /> 2) evaluate the ability to provide additional on-site parking (possibly through a <br /> shared parking agreement) for use by residents of the senior apartment units <br /> in the Ironwood Development. <br /> The Commission, on a 3:0:2 vote, recommended the approval of the proposed <br /> applications by Ponderosa Homes to the City Council, with the project modifications <br /> mentioned above (reduction of density, provision of an amenity, and evaluation of <br /> additional parking supply). Commissioners O'Connor, Piper, and Ritter voted in favor of <br /> the project, with the identified modifications. Chair Allen and Commissioner Nagler <br /> abstained, noting that they could support a project on the site, but stating that the <br /> project design was not optimal and would have benefitted from a workshop with the <br /> Planning Commission. <br /> DISCUSSION <br /> Revised Plans <br /> The site plan was revised to reduce the overall residential density to allow for the <br /> development of an open space amenity. Specifically, the two lots that were located <br /> near Busch Road were removed, reducing the total number of residential units from 27 <br /> to 25. The area (approximately 11,000-square-feet) would be used as a passive <br /> recreational area, furnished with benches and landscaping, with low-water use species <br /> and secured by a wrought-iron style fence or a low masonry wall with a wrought-iron <br /> fence on top. The recreational area would be connected to the existing Iron Horse Trail <br /> via Private Court B and a five-foot wide trail and would be publically accessible via an <br /> Page 6 of 12 <br />