05 - Laserfiche WebLink

Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan Update for the City of Pleasanton updated. We will use the Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Optional Task 3.5 Strava Data or Other Assessment Program (described in the Project Origin/Destination Data Understanding) programs, policies, and practices As an optional task, we will purchase Strava data or benchmarking framework to assist the City in target other origin/destination (GPS cell phone) data to areas for further enhancement. understand how trips are currently made by walking Task 3.1 Refresh Goals and Policies and biking in Pleasanton. This will allow the City to Fehr & Peers will work with the City staff and the BPTC understand existing circulation patterns for walking to finalize the vision statement and key goals to be and biking and to help prioritize key routes. included in the Plan. We will prepare a draft vision TASK 4.EXISTING CONDITIONS UPDATE statement and Plan goals based our knowledge of Under Task 3, Fehr & Peers will assess existing Pleasanton and our experience working in similar cities. We will finalize the vision during a Steering conditions and lay the groundwork for the creation of Committee meeting. a fully-updated citywide bicycle network and a priority pedestrian network that reflects that latest conditions Task 3.2 Programs, Policies, and Practices in Pleasanton. Due to fiscal constraints, we will not be Benchmarking Assessment able to provide the City a full inventory of sidewalk Fehr & Peers will complete a benchmarking data; however, we can provide this inventory at the key assessment to determine how Pleasanton's existing destinations in Pleasanton through the day of programs, policies and practices for bicycling and walk/bike audits(Task 2.3). In addition to fieldwork and walking relate to industry best practices. The direct observation, we will use GI5-based quantitative benchmarking assessment will provide clear next steps analytical tools, such as level of traffic stress analysis to for enhancements to policies, programs, and practices understand priority areas in the city and opportunity that can be incorporated into the plan. areas. Task 3.3 Support Programs Task 4.1 Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities We will use the Task 3.2 benchmarking assessment to Inventory identify the kinds of support programs and We will be able to prepare this task efficiently through enhancements that the City should consider our work on the 2010 Plan. We will make updates to prioritizing.A key aspect of this task will be right-sizing the bicycle network based on direction from City Staff, the available funding and staff funding to support fieldwork, and Google Streetview reconnaissance. For these programs. Information from the public on their the pedestrian network, we will build on the priority areas of interest for support programs, whether that's inventory areas identified in the 2010 through the five educational, encouragement or enforcement related walk/bike audits proposed under Task 2.3 and include will be integrated into the programs an inventory of traffic control and marked crosswalks recommendations. in those areas. We will work with City staff and the Task 3.4 Performance Measures public to identify the most critical areas to inventory. Fehr& Peers will work collaboratively with the City and We will input that data in GIS for the City's use in the BPTC to identify performance measures against which future.We anticipate these areas being located around the Plan's success can be measured. We will prepare a the BART stations, transit and access the trail network. draft set of performance measures based on national Task 4.2 Collision Analysis best practices and our local expertise. Based on Fehr & Peers will use available Statewide Highway feedback, we will finalize the measures and use these Integrated Record System (SWITRS)data from the past as guiding principles for the network and priority 10 years to examine trends and patterns in bicycle- project work in subsequent tasks. auto and pedestrian-auto collisions in Pleasanton. As TASK 3 DEUVERABLES discussed in the project understanding, Pleasanton generally ranks well for safety compared to cities of • Draft and final set of goals and policies similar population. Nonetheless, the analysis of • Draft and final programs, policies, and practices reported collisions will assist the City in refreshing the assessment project list by ensuring that appropriate • Draft and final support programs chapter, countermeasures are included. This will also help the reflecting areas of enhancement identified in the City to identify locations that may be well-suited to benchmarking assessment safety-oriented competitive grants, such as the • Draft and final performance measures to help Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)grants. guide the Plan Update development FEHRtPEERS 9 �