My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
23
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
061615
>
23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 11:53:38 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 11:18:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/16/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
23
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
While it is difficult to predict the replenishment of the fund, over the past four years, the <br /> fund has received approximately $1.9 million and staff anticipates that this is reflective <br /> of the pace anticipated in the future. However, there are some larger projects, including <br /> the Auf der Maur development that will provide at least $1,041,421 in approximately 18 <br /> to 24 months and the Pacific Pearl development in Staples Ranch that is estimated to <br /> provide $330,000. In general, the largest share of revenue to the LIHF will continue to <br /> be from lower income housing fees, with miscellaneous revenues from land leases, and <br /> other sources also contributing and therefore, there is reason to assume that the <br /> amount of annual revenue will remain consistent in the near future. Nevertheless, the <br /> City has made a commitment to use a significant portion of the LIHF on Kottinger <br /> Gardens since the potential of obtaining this level of affordability in the market place is <br /> highly unlikely and because there are not any competing affordable projects planned for <br /> the near future. <br /> Option 2 — Provide a combination of fee waivers and a financial contribution. The City's <br /> Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance provides that the City Council may waive or defer City <br /> development impact and/or building permit fees as an incentive for an affordable <br /> development. While the City has not historically waived city permit fees, at times it has <br /> waived development impact fees. However, while this later approach was at one time <br /> effective, state law currently requires a developer to employ prevailing wage labor if a <br /> governmental agency contributes financially to a development and therefore, the use of <br /> this incentive has diminished over the years. However, for this project, MidPen will be <br /> using prevailing wage labor and therefore, there will not be a financial impact from this <br /> requirement. In total, City fees are estimated at $2,356,232 for this development. Of this <br /> amount, the following combination of fee waivers and City financial appropriations could <br /> be used to reach the desired city contribution: <br /> Option 2 Financial Contributions <br /> Source Amount <br /> In Lieu Park Dedication Fee $645,500 <br /> Public Facilities Fee $275,000 _ <br /> Traffic Impact Fee $312,000 <br /> City Financial Contribution (LIHF) $2,518,000 <br /> Total $3,750,000 <br /> While the above would reduce the City's financial contribution, it would impact the City's <br /> ability to make other necessary community park, roadway and facility improvements <br /> made available through the fee revenue and therefore, it could have an overall negative <br /> impact on the community. To address this situation, when the City has waived <br /> development impact fees it has typically "backfilled" them through an allocation from the <br /> LIHF which assured that there would not be an overall impact to the areas intended to <br /> benefit from receipt of the development impact fees. Considering this financial <br /> arrangement, pursuing the backfilling concept is the same as simply selecting Option 1. <br /> Option 3- Do nothing and reassess the tax credit environment during the next round of <br /> funding in March 2016. Overall, while the tax credit environment may change prior to <br /> the next round of application submittals, MidPen's assessment is that awards will <br /> remain competitive for some time into the future and therefore, this approach may not <br /> yield timely results. Nevertheless, the potential exists that after multiple application <br /> Page 6of7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.