My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
23
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
061615
>
23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 11:53:38 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 11:18:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/16/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
23
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
approvals in place and all other financing sources committed. Kottinger Gardens scores <br /> perfectly and has all required approvals and financing source commitments. <br /> Because most 9% tax credit applications have a perfect score, in order to determine <br /> which projects receive a tax credit allocation, TCAC uses a tiebreaker system which <br /> measures a project's ability to leverage public funding and its cost efficiency. This <br /> means that a project is incentivized to reduce its Tax Credit request and to secure more <br /> public funds in order to increase its tiebreaker. <br /> As a result of this competitive situation, MidPen has surveyed the other projects <br /> expected to compete in the North/East Bay Region in the upcoming July application <br /> round, and has determined that Kottinger Gardens will need additional public funds in <br /> order to have a tiebreaker high enough to win an award of 9% tax credits and as such, it <br /> is requesting City Council consideration of that matter. <br /> DISCUSSION <br /> There are two issues driving the need for additional project funding. The first is the <br /> overall increased cost of the project which results primarily from increased hard <br /> construction costs as estimated by MidPen's general contractor and the escalating cost <br /> of area rents which are impacting the cost of temporarily relocating existing Kottinger <br /> Place residents during Phase I construction. Unfortunately, while these market forces <br /> are fundamentally outside of the City's control, the do impact the project's bottom line <br /> cost. However, while the costs have increased, they increase the project's valuation <br /> which may lead to increased investor equity that addresses the increase and as such, <br /> securing the tax credits situation is critical for project feasibility. Nevertheless, MidPen <br /> has selected Segue Construction, Inc., of Pleasanton as its general contractor and <br /> based on staffs and MidPen's experience working with Segue previously in its role as <br /> general contractor for the Parkview Assisted Living development and MidPen's focus on <br /> controlling project costs, staff is of the opinion that development costs are being <br /> appropriately controlled. <br /> Staff has reviewed the tax credit tiebreaker information in depth with MidPen and it <br /> agrees that Kottinger Gardens' success in the Tax Credit competition for this current <br /> round of TCAC applications will require additional contributions from non-tax credit <br /> sources, which based on the limited options for acquiring funding from other sources, <br /> means contributions from the City. Assuming the limited opportunity for additional <br /> funding and the critical nature of the tax credit funds, staff and MidPen have identified <br /> three options to address this situation: <br /> Option 1- Provide an additional appropriation of $3,750,000 from the LIHF. If approved, <br /> this option would result in a total financial commitment of $13,750,000 for the entire <br /> project (Phase I and Phase II). Currently, the UHF has a balance of approximately $16 <br /> million as a result the additional allocation would leave a balance of $2,250,000 for <br /> future projects, including a financial contribution anticipated for the Sunflower Hill project <br /> should it receive the necessary city entitlements. Based on an overall assessment, this <br /> option would provide the best opportunity for success during the tax credit review <br /> process. <br /> Page 5 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.