My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
23
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
061615
>
23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 11:53:38 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 11:18:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/16/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
23
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
submittals, the project could be awarded the tax credits resulting in a reduced financial <br /> contribution. <br /> While all of the above offer some advantages and disadvantages, staff prefers Option 1 <br /> as it provides the greatest assurance that the project moves forward in a timely manner <br /> and that Phase II (the Pleasanton Gardens site) will be funded in a timely manner. <br /> If Phase I is successful in the July competition, construction would begin in March, <br /> 2016. Nevertheless, funding is not guaranteed and staff will continue working with <br /> MidPen to monitor this situation. If the award is not made, the City will reapply in March <br /> 2016 which would impact the schedule accordingly. <br /> When evaluating this funding request it is important to note that the current project <br /> development budget includes hard cost and construction loan interest reserve <br /> contingencies and assuming the relocation and construction cost reach targets, there is <br /> the potential for a reduced overall contribution if the full contingency is not used. Finally, <br /> it should be noted that Kottinger Gardens is structured to maintain positive cash flow for <br /> at least 30 years and its estimated operating budget includes all costs to maintain the <br /> property and provide on-site services to the residents. As a result, additional <br /> contributions are not anticipated after project construction. <br /> If the City Council concurs with staffs recommendation, then the recommended <br /> amendment will be executed and the $3,750,000 would be appropriated for this <br /> purpose. Regarding the actual loan, the DDA requires that a simple interest of 3% <br /> accrue on the principal amount. Currently, there is an executed promissory note in <br /> place for the $2.8 predevelopment loan and a subsequent promissory loan would be <br /> made with the remaining $7.2 million. Once the project is constructed the City and <br /> MidPen will execute final documents detailing all loan terms which are expected to <br /> include that the loan has a term of 55 years and that repayment would be required an <br /> unauthorized transfer, default or the end of the loan term. In addition staff anticipates <br /> that there will be some level of sharing of excess cash flow, if any that would be used to <br /> meet loan costs. However, as with most affordable housing loans, there should not be <br /> an expectation that the City will receive regular, or any, payments of these loans during <br /> their term. <br /> Submitted by: Approved by: <br /> teven :ocian Tina Olson Nelson Fialho <br /> Assistant City Manager Director of Finance City Manager <br /> Attachments: <br /> Resolution appropriating funds and amending the DDA <br /> Page 7 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.