Laserfiche WebLink
SEMICEMMIt <br /> Subject. FW: Regarding today's city council meeting (6/2/2015). <br /> SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL <br /> From: Yongdong Zhao Provided to thp1 City�Council <br /> Sent:Tuesday, June 02, 2015 10:34 AM After Distribution of Packet <br /> To: Mayor and City Council <br /> Subject: Regarding today's city council meeting (6/2/2015). Date . b"Zr'U/5 <br /> Dear Pleasanton City Council Member, <br /> I attended several city council meetings regarding East Pleasanton development plan. As the result of May 19th <br /> meeting, city council agreed to put the development plan to the ballot to let the voters decide whether to <br /> continue with the development. <br /> I heard that placing this on the November ballot could cost the city between nearly $500,000 to over $600,000. <br /> Delaying the ballot to March or June, 2016 would significantly reduce the costs and potentially allow for the <br /> drafting of a more clear, balanced and complete wording of the issues to be voted on. <br /> While I strongly support voters making decisions about the future of East Pleasanton, I am concerned that <br /> rushing decisions tomorrow night could lead though in a way that puts an expensive and less than clear measure <br /> on the November ballot. <br /> Here is the way I support: <br /> 1.Halt the East Pleasanton Specific Plan EIR process for now per your vote at the last meeting <br /> 2.Ask the EPSP Task Force to fmalize their recommended plan and present it to the City Council <br /> 3.Schedule the ballot measure for March or June of 2016 to drastically reduce the cost of the vote, and let <br /> the people make the decision on whether or not East Pleasanton is re-zoned for massive development <br /> Thanks so much for your time and support. <br /> Best Regards, <br /> Yongdong Zhao <br /> 11 years Pleasanton residence <br /> Click here to report this email as spam. <br /> 1 <br />