My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
060215
>
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
>
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 12:06:03 PM
Creation date
6/2/2015 8:44:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/2/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL <br /> Subject FW: East Pleasanton Plan Provided to the City Council <br /> After Distribution of Packet <br /> From: smfrawley <br /> Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2015 10:51 AM Da4e . 6o -Ti-20/5 <br /> To: Mayor and City Council <br /> Subject: East Pleasanton Plan <br /> Dear Pleasanton Council, <br /> I have rarely gotten involved in local politics, but'The Plan"that is being proposed is one that I must voice my opinion on. There has <br /> been much discussion among my Pleasanton friends and neighbors and friends from other communities such as Dublin and San <br /> Ramon who have not spoken out against questionable massive development proposals. <br /> I am but one person appealing to you but find that I am the voice of a growing number of residents who have grave concerns regarding <br /> the proposed residential development plan. As more and more residents are becoming aware of the potential negative impact this <br /> development will have on our community, support for"The Plan"is without question declining dramatically. Residents are saying such <br /> things as"I had no idea",'Why would the Counsel continue to support a plan that has no true benefit for the current citizens of our city", <br /> 'Why is the Counsel supporting this plan when the results of such will destroy the tranquillity of our community", etc. <br /> I do not understand why the majority of Counsel members continue to support this plan when there have been countless, informed <br /> citizens who have presented documentation to the Counsel and their staff regarding the adverse effects of The Plan". You have been <br /> elected to"REPRESENT'the citizens of this community,which in my mind means"PROTECTING US"from development plans such <br /> as the one that is being proposed. I would really like to see the Counsel and their staff develop a chart outlining the advantages as well <br /> as the disadvantages of this Plan (as already presented by informed, concerned citizens). Show us why this Plan is something for us to <br /> embrace rather than fight against. <br /> In closing, I have been a resident of Pleasanton since 1971 and have watched my quiet little community change a great deal,much of <br /> which has been good change. Please,for the sake of all of us who love this community, step back and re-look at the real push for the <br /> Plan. Is it really because it will enhance this community? I just haven't heard anything from the Council or their staff to indicate such. <br /> Thank you for considering my concerns and my request to put this Plan to the Voters or to stop it. Since this Plan will have direct and <br /> indirect impact on almost all of us who live in Pleasanton, I feel you must consider the wishes of your constituency. <br /> Sandie Frawley <br /> Click here to report this email as spam. <br /> t <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.