Laserfiche WebLink
Finally, a new technology fee is proposed to address the increased costs related to <br /> electronic hardware and software licensing, ongoing maintenance fees, and archiving <br /> costs, as well as, the cost of upgrading the permit software system, interactive voice <br /> response (IVR) system, and document archiving cost were not previously addressed, <br /> and are now being consolidated into a single fee. <br /> With these proposed changes in the Building Division's development related user fees, <br /> the City will once again achieve its policy of 100% cost recovery for the Building <br /> Division. <br /> Planning Division <br /> The Planning Division processes all zoning and land use applications in the City; <br /> prepares, oversees and reviews all special studies associated with long-range land use <br /> objectives and entitlements; works with residents, businesses and the development <br /> community to facilitate the review of new projects; and supports the City Council and the <br /> Planning Commission. The total budgeted cost of planning services related to private <br /> development and fee related activities in 2014/15FY is $2,012,313. Currently, the City <br /> recovers 9.5% ($144,515) of these costs; therefore, the annual General Fund subsidy is <br /> approximately $1,867,798. Few cities in California subsidize development fees to such <br /> a level and most cities seek a cost recovery level in the range of 75% to 100% for <br /> planning related services. Staff felt that given that the planning fees are so low it would <br /> not be practical for the City to try and reach these cost recovery levels immediately. <br /> Instead, the Study recommends a 25% cost recovery level ($503,078). <br /> One comment staff received from the business community in 2011 was the potential <br /> burden of an increase in planning fees at the initial stages of a project. They proposed a <br /> lower recovery rate during the planning stage; deferring a majority of the cost to the <br /> building permit stage when projects have financing. Therefore, staff has included 36% <br /> of the cost of planning services in the development of the building permit cost recovery <br /> rate. This results in the cost recovery rate for planning to increase from its <br /> recommended level of 25% to 61%; 25% coming from the planning phase and 36% <br /> from the building permit phase of a project's development. This further reduces the <br /> annual General Fund subsidy for Planning by $724,433. <br /> The cities of Fremont and Walnut Creek have a 15% surcharge on all building permit <br /> fees to offset a portion of the Planning Department fees. Our proposed 36% offset by <br /> the Building Department of Planning fees is equivalent to a 16.98% surcharge on <br /> building permit fees. However, in all cases our proposed fees with the surcharge <br /> included are lower than Fremont's and Walnut Creek's building fees without their <br /> surcharge included (see the Building and Safety Division Fee Comparison Chart <br /> herein). <br /> Engineering Division <br /> The Engineering Division is responsible for overseeing the project development, design, <br /> survey, inspection and contract administration for all public improvements including the <br /> City's capital improvement program and private improvements (other than the building <br /> Page 4 of 9 <br />