My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
02
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
040715SP
>
02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 2:46:12 PM
Creation date
4/1/2015 3:36:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
4/7/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
2
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
improvements which are inspected by the Building and Safety Division). The total <br /> budgeted cost of all engineering services is $4,859,426, of which $1,319,817 is fee <br /> related. The City currently recovers approximately $295,000 (22%) of these costs <br /> through user fees with a General Fund subsidy of $1,024,817. A cost recovery level of <br /> 22% is low for engineering services statewide. Staff recommends full cost recovery <br /> (approximately 100%) for this area. However, the actual fees are received upfront in a <br /> projects development and the services are provided over an eighteen (18) to thirty-six <br /> (36) month period. Therefore, for calculating annual revenues a more realistic cost <br /> recovery rate is 43% ($567,521). The only fee that would not be 100% cost recovery is <br /> the wide load permits. This fee is set by State law and is not 100% cost recovery. The <br /> division is also recommending restructuring many of its map fee categories to <br /> consolidate the fee schedule and make it more user- friendly. <br /> Improvement plan checking represents a large portion of the subsidy in this division. <br /> Improvement plan checking includes review, modification and approval of the <br /> construction plans for both on-site and off-site public and private improvements such as <br /> roads, curbs, gutters, utilities (water, sewer, gas and electric), storm drains, street <br /> lighting, traffic improvements, and other appurtenances. In 1992 when the last fee <br /> increase was contemplated, the plan was to resolve an inconsistency that exists in the <br /> City's Master Fee Schedule; however, as indicated earlier, due to the economic <br /> downturn at that time the fee increases were not implemented. The current fee <br /> schedule includes a fee for engineering services related only to off-site public <br /> improvements equal to 2% of the value of these improvements; however, it does not <br /> have a fee for improvement plan checking for all the remaining improvements. Off-site <br /> public improvements are a small portion of the on-site and off-site public and private <br /> improvements related to a project. Therefore, the fee should be charged for all on-site <br /> and off-site private and public improvements related to a project. The recommended fee <br /> schedule proposes to correct this inconsistency in the Master Fee Schedule. By doing <br /> this, a majority of the subsidy by the General Fund to this division is further reduced. <br /> Fire Prevention <br /> Fire Prevention services are provided by the Livermore-Pleasanton Fire Department <br /> (LPFD). The total cost of all fire prevention services provided by LPFD to Pleasanton <br /> entities is approximately $14 million. The total cost of fee-related services is <br /> approximately $1,104,770. The City's current fee revenue totals approximately $62,500 <br /> for a cost recovery rate of 5%. Currently a majority of this revenue is collected for new <br /> construction and tenant improvements, while annual fire inspections are provided free of <br /> charge. It is important to note that almost all of the jurisdictions in California charge fees <br /> for annual fire inspections, including Livermore. PRM worked with Livermore to develop <br /> their fee structure for fire inspection services provided by LPFD. The fees were adopted <br /> by the Livermore City Council in May 2008. The proposal is to have the same fire <br /> inspection fee schedule that Livermore adopted. This is because the same services are <br /> provided to both jurisdictions by the same staff. The only logical way to differentiate <br /> between the two (if that is the desire of the Council) would be for Pleasanton to continue <br /> to subsidize the fire prevention services provided by LPFD's staff to Pleasanton <br /> Page 5 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.