Laserfiche WebLink
1.Project Description and Approach <br /> high-volume roadways and stationary sources, as well as construction equipment,that can cause <br /> health risk impacts. Mitigation measures from the General Plan EIR and/or GPA EIR will be <br /> revised for their potential to reduce impacts at the project site. Additional mitigation measures for <br /> aesthetic, visual and scenic resources will be identified where necessary to reduce any significant <br /> effects. <br /> • Noise. Project-related noise impacts could arise from the relatively high, but temporary, noise <br /> levels from project construction activities and from the long-term increases in traffic volumes. <br /> ESA will identify the noise-sensitive land uses or activities in the vicinity of the project site, such <br /> as residences across Stoneridge Drive,to the south,and roads that would receive motor vehicle <br /> traffic generated by project development and assess the difference in noise levels resulting from <br /> the change in traffic due to the proposed land use change. Specific tasks will include documenting <br /> existing noise levels at the project site by collecting long-term and short-term noise <br /> measurements at the project site and calculate Ldn or CNEL average noise levels for the site, <br /> based on the noise measurements for comparison to Land Use Compatibility standards. Using the <br /> Federal Highway Administration(FHWA)noise model, the analysis will quantify the increase in <br /> noise levels along roadways used to access the project site based on traffic increases predicted in <br /> the transportation analysis.ESA will rely on mitigation measures identified in the General Plan <br /> EIR and/or GPA EIR, if necessary. <br /> • Transportation and Circulation. ESA will team with Fehr and Peers(F&P)to prepare a <br /> transportation and circulation analysis for the EIR. ESA and F&P successfully provided the <br /> transportation analysis for the General Plan Amendment and Rezoning MR. F&P's proposed <br /> scope of work is attached for the City's review(see Attachment 1). Their analysis will include a <br /> review of the Citywide Traffic Model to ensure that the parcels are coded correctly. It will also <br /> include a traffic analysis that will look at 15 key intersections under Existing, Existing plus <br /> Project,Existing plus Approved Projects, Existing plus Approved Projects plus Project, <br /> Cumulative and Cumulative plus Project. The revised scope of work(see Attachment 2) includes <br /> analyzing nine of the key intersection during the Saturday peak hour. The traffic analysis will <br /> identify any intersections that would be impacted under the build out of the proposed zoning <br /> revisions, including an initial cumulative assessment at the intersections that provide access to the <br /> project site. The additional traffic analysis will also provide site planning guidance and a vehicle <br /> miles travelled assessment. The results of the traffic analysis will be presented in the EIR; a <br /> separate traffic study will not be prepared. <br /> The additional services scope of work (see Attachment 3) includes costs to update the analysis <br /> for the preferred project, reevaluate project impacts under each scenario, and conduct a <br /> quantitative project analysis for each alternative (or to reduce costs, staff may select to have a <br /> qualitative project alternative analysis conducted). <br /> • Other CEQA Environmental Factors. The impacts of the rezoning on other CEQA <br /> Environmental Factors will be discussed, including technical supporting evidence in the EIR. <br /> Each topic will address potential impacts and draw on mitigation measures from the General Plan <br /> EIR and/or GPA EIR to address potential impacts. <br /> As the Economic and Fiscal Element of the General Plan pre-dates the Climate Action Plan, it is assumed <br /> that the rezoning is accounted for in the modeling that was conducted for the CAP. <br /> In general,other issues are anticipated to be fully analyzed briefly, but in sufficient detail to credibly <br /> demonstrate their lack of significance under CEQA,assuming this finding can be made. For instance,it <br /> appears unlikely that the proposed project will result in any noticeable changes to agricultural resources, <br /> cultural resources, biological resources, recreational facilities, mineral resources, or other environmental <br /> 1-4 City of Pleasanton Johnson Drive Economic Development Zone EIR <br />