My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
03
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
031715
>
03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 2:42:33 PM
Creation date
3/11/2015 11:37:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/17/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
3
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
F1.Project Description and Approach <br /> plan amendment and rezoning for the Johnson Drive site)would likely be the cause of new and/or more <br /> severe impacts, should any be identified. <br /> ESA will prepare a SEIR including a robust technical analysis of the identified key environmental issues. <br /> Based upon the RFP, for the purposes of this proposal ESA assumes that four issues—Aesthetics,Air <br /> Quality, Noise, and Transportation—will be fully analyzed in the SEIR, with the remainder of the <br /> environmental topics on the CEQA Checklist assumed to be discussed in lesser detail, in a separate <br /> section of the document. Mitigation measures from the General Plan EIR and/or GPA EIR will be <br /> reviewed for the applicability to the proposed Johnson Drive project. <br /> This revised scope of work includes staff hours to update the SEIR project description and associated <br /> technical analysis completed to-date with the current project description. <br /> As set forth in the RFP, ESA will provide the City with five(5)copies of the ADEIR, as well as one <br /> unbound copy and an electronic copy. <br /> • Aesthetics/Light and Glare. The impacts of the rezoning on aesthetic,visual,and scenic <br /> resources will be evaluated, including potential loss of views and effects of increased lighting on <br /> motorists and residents in the City(and,potentially, residents of Dublin, immediately across <br /> Interstate 580). Policies and programs provided in the General Plan and standard City <br /> requirements will be evaluated as to their effect of mitigating or avoiding any potentially <br /> significant effects. Mitigation measures from the General Plan EIR and/or GPA EIR will be <br /> revised for their potential to reduce impacts at the project site. Additional mitigation measures for <br /> aesthetic,visual and scenic resources will be identified where necessary to reduce any significant <br /> effects. <br /> Visual Massing Simulations <br /> ESA will team with Environmental Vision to provide visual massing simulations for the proposed <br /> project in support of the Aesthetics analysis. The simulations would be completed from three <br /> public viewpoints and reflect before and after images of the project site. <br /> • Air Quality. The air quality analysis will focus on air quality effects primarily from increased <br /> traffic, including any identified health risk effects,and will also address cumulative effects <br /> relative to other reasonably anticipated development,as well as project consistency with the <br /> regional air quality plan. The analysis will discuss the regional and local air quality setting, <br /> ambient air monitoring data, and current air quality management efforts. The analysis will <br /> identify the nearest sensitive air pollutant receptors to the rezone area—residences across <br /> Stoneridge Drive,to the south, and across 1-680,to the west—and any major existing sources of <br /> air pollutants, including those in the inventory data compiled by the Bay Area Air Quality <br /> Management District(BAAQMD). The BAAQMD CEQA Air Quality Guidelines significance <br /> criteria with regard to air quality impacts will be relied upon.' <br /> The EIR analysis will discuss emissions likely to be generated during construction of subsequent <br /> development projects under the zoning amendment,evaluate the potential for construction dust to <br /> cause any local exceedances of ambient particulate standards,and estimate future criteria air <br /> pollutant emissions from vehicular traffic and onsite stationary sources. The SEIR analysis will <br /> identify, as feasible, what types and size of development would likely be of concern. Further, <br /> ESA will address diesel particulate matter(DPM), a toxic air contaminant(TAC), emitted from <br /> I Although the BAAQMD significance criteria remain suspended pending a decision by the California Supreme Court in a lawsuit filed by <br /> the California Building Industry Association,these criteria are supported by substantial evidence in the form of BAAQMD's 2009 <br /> Thresholds and Justifications Report. <br /> Cl't of Pleasanton Johnson Drive Economic Development Zone EIR 1-3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.