10 - Laserfiche WebLink

BACKGROUND Since the 1980's, Pleasanton City Councils have discussed various plans and taken steps to maximize the use of the civic center property to best meet community needs and meet administrative office space requirements. As a result, over the years, the City has developed the civic center site with the construction of the Police Department building and the Pleasanton Library and the acquisition of 123 Main Street. This development all occurred prior too much of the community's residential and commercial growth and in an attempt to keep pace with the resulting demands, the City installed modular buildings and acquired the 157 Main Street building and property. In recognition of an interest to develop a comprehensive plan for the entire civic center site, the City Council in 2001 authorized a Civic Center Master Plan study that resulted in various conceptual plans for the site all of which assumed retention of the Pleasanton Library and the Police Department building but replacement of administrative buildings and the addition of a community plaza area that coincided with the then recently completed Downtown Specific Plan. While this plan offered a generally plausible vision for the site, it failed to consider the considerable growth that would occur in library usage following our withdrawal from the Alameda County Library System. As such, in 2004 based on a recommendation from the Library Commission, the City Council authorized a library needs assessment study and in 2006 it authorized a Pleasanton Library Technical Study/Conceptual Design and Preliminary Cost Estimate. This later study was presented to the City Council at a joint workshop with the Library Commission in October 2009 and as an outcome of that meeting, the City Council authorized additional study related to a civic center master plan to incorporate the Pleasanton Library needs analysis generated from the previous studies. This work was completed in late 2010. DISCUSSION While the above studies have been helpful in assessing use and cost implications for the civic center site, they have generally been narrow in scope with only limited or no consideration given to a broader range of options, including use of the Bemal Property, replacement of the Police Department building, taking advantage of existing private office spaces and/or exploring ways to maximize the economic and community value of the civic center site as envisioned in the current City Council Work Plan. As such, staff is of the opinion that it would be beneficial to conduct this broader study and to do so it would also be beneficial to incorporate broader representation from the City and the community by utilizing a public ad hoc committee. While staff anticipates that the full charge of an ad hoc Civic Center Committee would be developed through the committee process, it foresees that its activities and scope would minimally include: Page 2 of 4