08 - Laserfiche WebLink

• City of Pleasanton Recycled Water Project CEQA Addendum Table 3 Environmental Review of Proposed Project Changes Do Proposed I Changes Are Prior Involve Any New Mitigation What were the New Circumstances Measures Where Impact(s) Environmental Significant Involving New Any New Sufficient for were Analyzed Impact or Significant Information Addressing in conclusions for Substantially Impacts Requiring Any New Prior the Original More or Substantially New Potential Environmental Proposed Severe More Severe Analysis or Changes or Environmental Issue Area Documents. Project? Impacts? Impacts? Verification? Impacts? • Mitigation Measure NOI-3: Maintain Mufflers on Equipment • Mitigation Measure NOI-4: Idling Prohibition and Enforcement • Mitigation Measure NOI-5: Equipment Location and Shielding Project Change Discussion: The proposed changes to the Proposed would have the same impacts on noise and sensitive receptors as the Original Proposed Project. The addition of 720 feet or 0.1 mile of new pipeline would not result in any new impacts as was evaluated in the IS/MND. Also, the construction activities associated with the revised pipeline conveyance facilities would be substantially the same as they were originally described in the IS/MND as they would also be constructed within existing roadways, highly disturbed areas, and/or public right-of-ways. The Revised Proposed Project therefore would not have any incrementally significant effects on noise and sensitive receptors as defined in CEQA Guideline section 15162(a). IS/MND Population and Page 3-34 NI No No No Yes Housing IS/MND Discussion: The Proposed Project would not induce population growth either directly or indirectly. The Proposed Project/Action would be to serve the City with up to 2,500 afy of tertiary treated recycled water for irrigation purposes. This would help supplement the City's current groundwater supplies, but would not be a sufficient supply to induce urban growth in the area. Construction of the Proposed Project/Action would avoid the need to demolish any existing houses and would not affect any other housing structures. In addition, construction, operation, and maintenance would not result in any substantial increase in numbers of permanent workers/employees. Therefore,no impacts are anticipated and no mitigation is required. IS/MND Mitigation Measures: • None identified or necessary. Project Change Discussion: The proposed changes to the Proposed would have the same impact on population and/or housing as the Original Proposed Project. The addition of 720 feet or 0.1 mile of new pipeline would not result in any new impacts as was evaluated in the IS/MND. Also, the construction activities associated with the revised pipeline conveyance facilities would be substantially the same as they were originally described in the IS/MND as they would also be constructed within existing roadways, highly disturbed areas, and/or public right-of-ways. The Revised Proposed Project therefore would not have any incrementally significant effects on population and/or housing as defined in CEQA Guideline section I5162(a). Public Services IS/MND Page 3-35 NI No No No Yes IS/MND Discussion: The Proposed Project would not generate population growth and the operation and maintenance of the Proposed Project would not be labor intensive. In addition,the Proposed Project would not increase the demand for the kinds of public services that would support new residents,such as schools,parks, fire,police,or other public facilities. As a result,no impacts are anticipated and no mitigation is required. December 2014 3A