My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
10 EXHIBIT F
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2014
>
120214
>
10 EXHIBIT F
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/27/2015 11:35:42 AM
Creation date
11/25/2014 11:21:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/2/2014
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
10 EXHIBIT F
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Initial Study and Negative Declaration <br />Result in reducing the Level of Service (LOS) at a major intersection to LOS E <br />or F, except in the Downtown and gateway intersections *. <br />*Gateway intersections are intersections located at the edges of the city <br />and are specifically identified on Table 3 -4 of the Circulation Element of the <br />2005 -2025 General Plan. Per the General Plan, consideration may be given <br />to traffic improvements at gateway intersections when it is determined that <br />such improvements are necessary and are consistent with maintaining visual <br />character, landscaping, and pedestrian amenities. <br />Issues <br />Less Than <br />Significant <br />Potentially Impact With Less Than <br />Significant Mitigation Significant No <br />Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br />Transportation and Traffic <br />Would the project: <br />a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance, or <br />policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the <br />performance of the circulation system, taking into <br />account all modes of transportation including mass <br />transit and non - motorized travel and relevant <br />components of the circulation system, including but <br />not limited to intersections, streets, highways and <br />freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass <br />transit? <br />b) Conflict with an applicable congestion <br />management program, including but not limited to <br />level of service standards and travel demand <br />measures, or other standards established by the <br />county congestion management agency for <br />designated roads or highways? <br />c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including <br />either an increase in traffic levels or a change in <br />location those results in substantial safety risks? <br />d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design <br />feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous <br />intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm <br />equipment)? <br />e) Result in inadequate emergency access? <br />f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs <br />X <br />[xl <br />X <br />X <br />X <br />43 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.