10 ATTACHMENTS 8-11 - Laserfiche WebLink

Staff finds that size, location, and quantity of the signage proposed for the development to be acceptable. Staff recommends that the Pleasanton sign be illuminated either by spot lights or by hallo - illumination. PUD DEVELOPMENT PLAN FINDINGS The Zoning Ordinance of the Pleasanton Municipal Code sets forth the purposes of the Planned Unit Development (PUD) District and the considerations to be addressed in reviewing a PUD Development Plan. The Planning Commission must find that the proposed PUD development plan conforms to the purposes of the PUD District, as listed below, before making its recommendation to the City Council. 1. Whether the plan is in the best interests of the public health, safety, and general welfare: The proposed project, as conditioned, meets all applicable City standards concerning public health, safety, and welfare. The subject development would include the installation of all required on -site utilities with connections to municipal systems in order to serve the new development. With the proposed roadway improvements, the project will not generate volumes of traffic that cannot be accommodated by existing City streets and intersections in the area. The restaurant building would be designed to meet the requirements of the Uniform Building Code, Fire Code, and other applicable City codes. Adequate access would be provided to the proposed development for police, fire, and other emergency response vehicles. Stormwater run -off from the site will be treated before leaving the site. Construction hour limits and dust suppression requirements will minimize construction impacts on the surrounding hotel guests and tenants. The proposed development is compatible with the adjacent uses and would be consistent with the existing scale and character of the area. Therefore, staff believes that this finding can be made. 2. Whether the plan is consistent with the City's General Plan and any applicable specific plan: With the proposed General Plan amendments, the proposed project would change the current General Plan Land Use Designations of "Open Space — Public Health and Safety" and `Retail /Highway /Service Commercial, Business and Professional Offices" to "Business Park ", therefore providing a consistent land use designation with the adjoining Pleasanton Square II Shopping Center. The Chick -fil -A site is located near the Interstate 1 -580 EB Hopyard Road exit, and is surrounded by shopping centers to the west and northwest, and an office building to the south. The proposed restaurant with drive - through service would be compatible with the surrounding uses. The proposed FAR of 15% for the Chick -fil -A site conforms to the 60% maximum FAR limit in the General Plan. The existing office site at 6111 Johnson Court would have a FAR of 34.5 %, which also conforms to the 60% maximum FAR limit in the General Plan. The project location is not located in a specific plan area. Therefore, staff believes the proposed development plan P13- 2533 /PUD- 100 /PUD- 96- 13 -02M Planning Commission Page 23 of 27