Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Harryman said yes. She indicated that it is the standard condition that was tweaked <br /> to meet the taphouse project. <br /> Mr. Weinstein stated that there is already a similar condition, Condition No. 3 under <br /> Exhibit A-2, that staff could modify which somewhat parallels the condition that <br /> Ms. Harryman just read. He indicated that it is focused mostly on the car wash right <br /> now, but staff could customize it to deal with noise, parking, and crime issues as well. <br /> Commissioner Ritter stated that with respect to alcohol sale, he still believes the zoning <br /> should be kept the same as what is in place for WalMart so it is fair in that same <br /> neighborhood. <br /> Commissioner Allen stated that given what Ms. Harryman mentioned under any <br /> Conditional Use Permit with all the caveats, it still puts the burden on the community, <br /> who will have to live with any problem for the next six months, and she did not think that <br /> was fair to the community because they are not supporting this. <br /> Chair O'Connor explained that the community will not have to wait six months because <br /> if it is a problem, staff could bring it to the Commission's attention immediately. <br /> Commissioner Allen stated that staff would have to find it first and then analyze it. <br /> Chair O'Connor indicated that staff would know if there is a problem. <br /> Commissioner Ritter moved to find that the proposed project would not have a <br /> significant effect on the environment and that the proposed PUD Rezoning and <br /> Development Plan are consistent with the General Plan and the purposes of the <br /> PUD ordinance; to make the PUD and Conditional Use Permit findings as listed in <br /> the staff report; and to recommend approval of Case PUD102, the PUD <br /> Development Plan, subject to the Conditions of Approval listed in Exhibit A-1 of <br /> the staff report; Case P14-0014, the Conditional Use Permit, subject to the <br /> Conditions of Approval listed in Exhibit A-2 of the staff report, with the addition of <br /> language to Condition No. 3 to specify that if any problems arise related to <br /> parking, traffic, noise, or the sale of alcohol, the Conditional Use Permit shall be <br /> referred back to the Planning Commission for review at a public hearing; and the <br /> revision of Condition No. 4 to limit the drive-thru carwash hours to 7:00 a.m.- <br /> 9:00 p.m.; and the Negative Declaration prepared for the project as shown in <br /> Exhibit H of the staff report. <br /> Commissioner Piper seconded the motion. <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 27, 2014 Page 33 of 44 <br />