14 ATTACHMENT 06 - Laserfiche WebLink

pick a time and vote on it. He added that this would be his preference, but the Commission can do what it is talking about. Commissioner Allen asked Mr. Dolan if the Commission voted on an item on whichever way it went, if the Commission could ask the Police Department for a report in six months. She explained that the Commission would not commit to it now, and the residents can certainly let the Commission know if there are issues. Mr. Dolan said yes. Commissioner Allen asked if, assuming there were issues, the Commission would have every right to bring this back for re-evaluation without it being set today. Mr. Dolan replied that the Commission can re-visit a Use Permit if there are issues. He clarified that it would not be six months from now, but six months after it is operating, which would probably be a year and a half from now. Commissioner Allen asked Mr. Dolan to share what is involved in re-looking at a Conditional Use Permit. Mr. Dolan replied that there would have to be some sort of violation. He asked Julie Harryman to explain. Ms. Harryman explained that a condition that the Commission sees normally with CUP's is similar to the one discussed in the taphouse case earlier, and it could and should probably be added to this application to alleviate some of the concerns. She read the condition, granted that it is for a bar: "if operation of the bar results in conflicts pertaining to parking, interior or exterior noise, traffic circulation, odor, smoke, or other issues related to outdoor grill area or other factors verified by City enforcement staff, the notification of Conditional Use Permit noise standards violations verified by City enforcement staff shall be provided to the Planning Commission by City staff. The Planning Commission may schedule a public hearing to re-review the Conditional Use Permit, and at the public hearing, the Planning Commission may revoke or modify the Conditional Use Permit to require additional measures as necessary to address any issues." She stated that rather than have these six-month automatic reviews for the reasons Mr. Dolan already explained, and every controversial item would start to get those because the neighbors would want it, staff should see first if there is a problem and then have them come back. She indicated that she can think of many, many projects that she thought the Commission might see again, and they actually did not. She noted that they worked out just fine and did not need to come back, although some of them did. Chair O'Connor asked Ms. Harryman if she would be able to craft a condition to add to this project that would be similar to the one for the taphouse that would be able to address these items should there be problems at this location for noise, alcohol, police, or whatever other issue. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 27, 2014 Page 32 of 44