22 - Laserfiche WebLink

4. Introduce the attached draft ordinance approving Case PUD-84 subject to the Conditions of Approval in Attachment 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENT The proposed project will be responsible for the installation of the necessary private infrastructure improvements to serve this development. The creation of new lots and construction of the new residences are subject to the payment of building permit fees, Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan fees and development fees at the time of development. Also, the newly constructed residences will generate property taxes and other tax revenues to be used to provide City services such as Police and Fire. BACKGROUND Frank and Barbara Berlogar are the owners of Lot 22 in Subarea 3 of the Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan (VACSP). The Berlogars' original lot was approximately 50.13-acres in size and was occupied by an existing single family home, a trailer home, and several accessory buildings. The lot has three Specific Plan land use designations: Low Density Residential (LDR), Hillside Residential (HR), and Open Space (OS). The VACSP allotted a total of 14 new residential units to be located on Lot 22 in addition to the existing home. The 14 new homes were allotted as follows: 9 new dwellings located in two LDR areas and 5 new dwellings in two Hillside Residential (HR) areas. The HR areas were located in two separate areas of the site and the Specific Plan allocates 3 new homes in the northern HR area and 2 new homes in the southern HR. The VACSP also allowed the construction of a second unit to replace the existing trailer home. Frank and Barbara Berlogar have submitted a PUD development plan application for two new residential lots in the northern HR area where three new lots are allowed by the Specific Plan. This project was first reviewed by the Planning Commission at a workshop held on July 24, 2013. At the workshop, the applicants included designs that showed the proposed roadway would be located on the west side of the proposed home sites. The Planning Commission dismissed the alternative roadway location as it would: 1) require significant grading, 2) remove heritage-sized trees, and 3) result in steep slope that would not meeting Fire requirements. For a detailed description of the discussion at these meeting, please see the attached Planning Commission minutes and staff report in Attachment 4. On February 12, 2014, the Planning Commission reviewed and recommended approval of the PUD development plan, specifically the Alternative 1 site layout. The application is now before the Council for final action. If the development plan is approved, the applicants will apply for a minor subdivision for three lots in accordance with the development plan. Minor subdivisions are reviewed and approved by the City's Zoning Administrator at a Staff Review Board hearing. Page 2 of 10