Laserfiche WebLink
THE CITY OF <br /> - ;, 22 <br /> CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT <br /> pLEASANTON. <br /> April 15, 2014 <br /> Community Development <br /> Planning Division <br /> TITLE: APPLICATION FROM FRANK AND BARBARA BERLOGAR FOR <br /> PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) DEVELOPMENT PLAN <br /> APPROVAL TO SUBDIVIDE AN APROXIMATELY 37.4-ACRE SITE <br /> LOCATED AT 88 SILVER OAKS COURT INTO THREE SINGLE- <br /> FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS: TWO LOTS MEASURING <br /> APPROXIMATELY 1.2 ACRES AND 1.9 ACRES FOR CUSTOM <br /> HOMES AND ONE LOT MEASURING APPROXIMATELY 34.3 <br /> ACRES FOR THE EXISTING DWELLING AND ACCESSORY <br /> STRUCTURES <br /> SUMMARY <br /> The application would subdivide an existing 37.4-acre site into three single-family <br /> residential lots: two new custom single-family lots and one remaining lot containing the <br /> existing Berlogar residence and accessory structures. <br /> At the February 12, 2014 meeting of the Planning Commission, staff presented the <br /> Berlogars proposed development as well as two alternative site layouts (known as <br /> Alterative 1 and Alternative 2.) Staff recommended Alternative 1 which the Planning <br /> Commission recommended to City Council by a 3-2 vote. (The two dissenting <br /> commissioners preferred the site layout in Alternative 2.) Staff believes that Alternative <br /> 1 provides for development of the site in a manner that is consistent with the Vineyard <br /> Avenue Corridor Specific Plan (VACSP). While adjacent property owners raised <br /> various issues primarily related to privacy and open space, staff believes the conditions <br /> of approval adequately address these issues. <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION <br /> Recommended approval of the site layout known as Alternative 1 subject to the <br /> conditions of approval in Attachment 1. <br /> RECOMMENDATION <br /> 1. Find that there are no new or changed circumstances or information which require <br /> additional CEQA review of the project; <br /> 2. Find that the proposed PUD development plan as shown in Alternative 1 is consistent <br /> with the General Plan and Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan; <br /> 3. Make the PUD findings as listed in this staff report; and, <br />