My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
22
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2014
>
041514
>
22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/19/2015 3:37:48 PM
Creation date
4/8/2014 4:56:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
4/15/2014
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
22
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
THE CITY OF <br /> - ;, 22 <br /> CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT <br /> pLEASANTON. <br /> April 15, 2014 <br /> Community Development <br /> Planning Division <br /> TITLE: APPLICATION FROM FRANK AND BARBARA BERLOGAR FOR <br /> PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) DEVELOPMENT PLAN <br /> APPROVAL TO SUBDIVIDE AN APROXIMATELY 37.4-ACRE SITE <br /> LOCATED AT 88 SILVER OAKS COURT INTO THREE SINGLE- <br /> FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS: TWO LOTS MEASURING <br /> APPROXIMATELY 1.2 ACRES AND 1.9 ACRES FOR CUSTOM <br /> HOMES AND ONE LOT MEASURING APPROXIMATELY 34.3 <br /> ACRES FOR THE EXISTING DWELLING AND ACCESSORY <br /> STRUCTURES <br /> SUMMARY <br /> The application would subdivide an existing 37.4-acre site into three single-family <br /> residential lots: two new custom single-family lots and one remaining lot containing the <br /> existing Berlogar residence and accessory structures. <br /> At the February 12, 2014 meeting of the Planning Commission, staff presented the <br /> Berlogars proposed development as well as two alternative site layouts (known as <br /> Alterative 1 and Alternative 2.) Staff recommended Alternative 1 which the Planning <br /> Commission recommended to City Council by a 3-2 vote. (The two dissenting <br /> commissioners preferred the site layout in Alternative 2.) Staff believes that Alternative <br /> 1 provides for development of the site in a manner that is consistent with the Vineyard <br /> Avenue Corridor Specific Plan (VACSP). While adjacent property owners raised <br /> various issues primarily related to privacy and open space, staff believes the conditions <br /> of approval adequately address these issues. <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION <br /> Recommended approval of the site layout known as Alternative 1 subject to the <br /> conditions of approval in Attachment 1. <br /> RECOMMENDATION <br /> 1. Find that there are no new or changed circumstances or information which require <br /> additional CEQA review of the project; <br /> 2. Find that the proposed PUD development plan as shown in Alternative 1 is consistent <br /> with the General Plan and Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan; <br /> 3. Make the PUD findings as listed in this staff report; and, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.