CCMIN020414 - Laserfiche WebLink

Councilmember Brown questioned whether time and resources should continue to be invested in a project that be cancelled in the near future. Mr. Dolan acknowledged the point but explained that this is an inefficient point in the planning process to stop. The draft plan, Environmental Impact Report and economic study are almost completed and really factor into the ability to have an informed discussion on the merits of the plan. Without the additional funding, which is relatively modest compared to what is already invested, the documents will be incomplete and of no use moving forward. Councilmember Brown stated that RHNA is a significant game changer and questioned whether the information gained today would even be valid in the 2022 timeframe. Mayor Thorne noted that the current lawsuits against ABAG and MTC could be another game changer, ultimately increasing RHNA numbers significantly. Councilmember Cook-Kallio distinctly recalled that the goal of the East Pleasanton Specific Plan was good planning and that RHNA only came into play as a result of the Urban Habitat lawsuit. For her, RHNA was part of the sidebar. She said the city is obligated to the twenty plus individuals who have spent the last two years serving on a task force with the expectation that their efforts would yield some sort of vision for the east side. The city also has an obligation of sorts to the school district to actively work to identify future school sites. Mayor Thorne opened the public hearing and, seeing no speakers, closed the public hearing. Mayor Thorne concurred with Councilmember Cook-Kallio's recollection, noting that discussions about an east side study began well before RHNA even existed. Mr. Dolan also noted that completion of the plan is identified as a program within the General Plan. Vice-Mayor Pentin recalled that when the Planning Commission reviewed the rezonings several years ago, there was specific direction not to include the Kewitt or Legacy properties in that process. The intent was to wait for completion of the Specific Plan to provide them with clear and fair direction regarding the city's expectations. RHNA was certainly at play but not the impetus. Councilmember Narum concurred and said she thought it would be a great disservice to the task force and the community to stop at this point. She said she was in the Council audience when then Mayor Pico decided there would be a comprehensive plan for the east side and noted that this was well before RHNA. She acknowledged that what comes out of this plan may not ultimately be built but said it will still serve as a solid framework for what is to come. Councilmember Brown noted that many citizens, if given the choice, envision parks and open space rather than high density development on the east side. She. asked that they be given equal consideration. She noted that many projects spend years in the planning process before it is ultimately determined they are not a good fit and stressed that the investment of time, effort and resources is not a good reason to keep pushing this forward. Mayor Thorne asked how much time had passed since completion of the Vineyard Corridor Specific Plan and its build out, noting that these are not intended to serve as short term documents. Mr. Fialho said it was approved in 1998 and is not yet complete. Councilmember Cook-Kallio asked and Mr. Fialho confirmed that the plan is funded solely by the developers in real time. City Council Minutes Page 14 of 15 February 4,2014