Laserfiche WebLink
5) Some may think we should continue to move forward since so much time has already been invested in this process <br /> and we should value the work done. If I felt that the assumptions and EIR/other analysis we would pursue now would <br /> be mostly valid in 2022, I would also be inclined to continue. <br /> a. However, I think much of the work will need to be reanalyzed as assumptions can change significantly. <br /> b. Just look at the change in our RHNA assumptions for 2014-2022 that happened since the end of last year. <br /> In summary, I believe we should stop work immediately on the EPSP and focus resources in areas where we can <br /> continue to best enhance Pleasanton's financial health and quality of life. <br /> Additional questions to pursue: <br /> • What do we do with excess RHNA? I assume we would not approve building for any more than our barebones <br /> requirements? <br /> o Can we rezone some land back to just commercial if we do not need it? <br /> o If so, how do we do this and what are implications? <br /> • Will we continue to honor the voter approved housing cap aside from exception that RHNA requirements may <br /> trump the cap at some future point in time? I hope that is the case but did want to validate. <br /> • EIR—if we continue with EIR now, how likely is it that this EIR will be considered valid in 2022 and we will not <br /> have to refresh the EIR? <br /> o How likely is it that a traffic study we do now will need to be redone based on 2022 data? <br /> • Do we risk losing county land to Livermore if we delay planning (and have Livermore build out land in our <br /> assumed jurisdiction)? How do we mitigate that risk? <br /> Thank you for your consideration. <br /> Nancy Allen <br /> Click here to report this email as spam. <br /> 2 <br />