My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2014
>
030414
>
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
>
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2014 1:43:55 PM
Creation date
3/3/2014 11:54:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/4/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5) Some may think we should continue to move forward since so much time has already been invested in this process <br /> and we should value the work done. If I felt that the assumptions and EIR/other analysis we would pursue now would <br /> be mostly valid in 2022, I would also be inclined to continue. <br /> a. However, I think much of the work will need to be reanalyzed as assumptions can change significantly. <br /> b. Just look at the change in our RHNA assumptions for 2014-2022 that happened since the end of last year. <br /> In summary, I believe we should stop work immediately on the EPSP and focus resources in areas where we can <br /> continue to best enhance Pleasanton's financial health and quality of life. <br /> Additional questions to pursue: <br /> • What do we do with excess RHNA? I assume we would not approve building for any more than our barebones <br /> requirements? <br /> o Can we rezone some land back to just commercial if we do not need it? <br /> o If so, how do we do this and what are implications? <br /> • Will we continue to honor the voter approved housing cap aside from exception that RHNA requirements may <br /> trump the cap at some future point in time? I hope that is the case but did want to validate. <br /> • EIR—if we continue with EIR now, how likely is it that this EIR will be considered valid in 2022 and we will not <br /> have to refresh the EIR? <br /> o How likely is it that a traffic study we do now will need to be redone based on 2022 data? <br /> • Do we risk losing county land to Livermore if we delay planning (and have Livermore build out land in our <br /> assumed jurisdiction)? How do we mitigate that risk? <br /> Thank you for your consideration. <br /> Nancy Allen <br /> Click here to report this email as spam. <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.