Laserfiche WebLink
Ayes: Councilmembers Brown, Cook-Kallio, Narum, Pentin, Mayor Thorne <br /> Noes: None <br /> Absent: None <br /> Amend Specific Plan Policies to require new homes to be one of the architectural styles found in <br /> existing Downtown historical homes <br /> MOTION: It was m/s by Brown/Cook-Kallio to amend Specific Plan Policies to require new homes to be <br /> one of the architectural styles found in existing Downtown historical homes. Motion carried by the <br /> following vote: <br /> Ayes: Councilmembers Brown, Cook-Kallio, Narum, Pentin, Mayor Thorne <br /> Noes: None <br /> Absent: None <br /> Amend Specific Plan Policies to adopt new mass and bulk compatibility standard <br /> Mayor Thorne said the nexus between bulk and mass and historic preservation escaped him and he <br /> could not support the task force recommendation. <br /> Councilmember Cook-Kallio said the presumption with FAR is that lots are of a consistent size, shape <br /> and elevation, none of which is the case in the downtown. She cited one example with which the <br /> Council struggled over FAR on an unusually shaped lot in the downtown. She said she would be more <br /> comfortable supporting this with some caveat that allowed for the appropriate application of common <br /> sense and consideration of surrounding FARs, lot sizes, shapes and elevations. <br /> Mayor Thorne suggested adding the task force's recommendation to the Planning Department's tool <br /> chest, but not necessarily require that it be followed as part of making a determination. <br /> Mr. Dolan stated that staff supported the task force recommendation, which was an average FAR <br /> calculation plus 25%. He explained that using it as a tool to judge applications on a case by case is <br /> what staff has been and can continue doing, though it sometimes becomes difficult. He also explained <br /> that lot shape and elevation are considered as part of the overall design but not in determining FAR. <br /> Councilmember Cook-Kallio explained that visualizing something like mass and scale on a graphic are <br /> very different from doing so in person and asked whether staff knew of a viable option for realistically <br /> demonstrating these impacts on a two dimensional scale. <br /> Councilmember Narum appreciated the task force's attempt to provide certainty in what has been an <br /> ongoing and controversial issue, but said she could not support the proposal. She said she would like <br /> the Design Guidelines to expand the discussion on mass and bulk, as well as how story poles and the <br /> FAR of surrounding properties can be used to evaluate these qualities. <br /> Councilmember Cook-Kallio asked how large an area staff surveys, under current practices, to help <br /> determine compatibility with respect to mass and bulk. <br /> Mr. Dolan stated that staff would likely use what is recommended in the proposed standard, which is <br /> 150 feet from the subject property. <br /> Councilmember Brown said she too would like to see surrounding FARs used as a tool rather than part <br /> of a concrete formula. She said that while the Gilmore house is certainly beautiful, it is significantly <br /> larger than other homes in the area. She noted the home has additional square footage in an <br /> unfinished second floor and multiple garages, none of which she understood to count towards FAR. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 8 of 14 January 21, 2014 <br />