My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN012114
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
CCMIN012114
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/20/2014 4:19:06 PM
Creation date
2/20/2014 4:19:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
1/21/2014
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
She asked whether the Council has the ability to modify which components are included as a part of the <br /> FAR calculation. <br /> Mr. Dolan explained that doing so would require that they restart the public hearing process in full and <br /> cautioned that something with such a far reaching impact would likely spark significant dialogue. He <br /> confirmed for Councilmember Brown that basement storage does not count toward floor area. <br /> Councilmember Cook-Kallio said she recently learned that some applicants provide photo-shopped <br /> images for a project. She said this can be misleading in its indication of true mass and asked whether <br /> the Council could request that edited photos be labeled in that manner. <br /> Mr. Dolan confirmed that staff often requests photo simulations. He acknowledged that they are artificial <br /> depictions of a project: but said that staff uses its best judgment to ensure their accuracy. <br /> Councilmember Pentin said he could support this as one of several tools to help in determining <br /> appropriate mass and bulk but that he was not willing to amend the current FAR standard. <br /> MOTION: It was m/s by Cook-Kallio/Thorne to retain the current more general policy language <br /> regarding compatibility, per the Planning Commission, but to use the proposed formula as one of <br /> several tools in determining the compatibility of mass and bulk with the surrounding neighborhood. <br /> Motion carried by the following vote: <br /> Ayes: Councilmembers Brown, Cook-Kallio, Narum, Pentin, Mayor Thorne <br /> Noes: None <br /> Absent: None <br /> Amend Specific Plan Policies to require detached garages for homes on lots exceeding 60 feet in width <br /> Councilmember Cook-Kallio asked to what extent this would affect properties currently using an <br /> easement for vehicular access. <br /> Mr. Dolan explained that the proposed language does acknowledge instances where the requirement <br /> would be unsuitable and provides a process to make the determination that an exception is appropriate. <br /> Such instances could include a shallow lot, heritage tree locations or various topographic features. As a <br /> legal restriction, an easement would actually carry greater weight than interference with a heritage tree. <br /> Councilmember Cook-Kallio asked whether this would require homes without an existing garage to add <br /> one as part of a remodel, assuming the lot is 60 feet in width. <br /> Mr. Dolan said "no." <br /> Councilmember Narum asked whether the language provides for exceptions in the case of undue <br /> hardship on adjoining properties or rear yard usage. <br /> Mr. Dolan confirmed, noting that the text includes two examples and is flexible enough to accommodate <br /> other situations. <br /> MOTION: It was m/s by Cook-Kallio/Brown to amend Specific Plan Policies to require detached <br /> garages for homes on lots exceeding 60 feet in width. Motion carried by the following vote: <br /> Ayes: Councilmembers Brown, Cook-Kallio, Pentin, Mayor Thorne <br /> Noes: Councilmember Narum <br /> Absent: None <br /> City Council Minutes Page 9 of 14 January 21,2014 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.