My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN051606
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
CCMIN051606
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/15/2013 5:01:52 PM
Creation date
10/15/2013 5:01:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/16/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Rasmussen noted the different process for the Master Plan; two different processes <br /> are occurring at the same time. <br /> Mr. Thorne commented that the Community Park plan does not need to be on the ballot, <br /> but the portion of the property with a youth center does. He then asked for a definition of a <br /> straw vote. <br /> Mr. Rasmussen clarified a straw vote as one that helps to resolve issues separately; <br /> then at the end a final vote can occur. <br /> Mayor Hosterman opened the public hearing. <br /> John Ainsworth, a Pleasanton resident, voiced his support to Council about six lighted <br /> tennis courts on the Bernal property and believed the development was exciting and that he <br /> would like to be able to play tennis at the park. <br /> Leonard Cooper, a Pleasanton resident, announced that the new Pleasanton <br /> Community Tennis Club had been established and he supports and encourages development of <br /> new courts on the Bemal property. He asked that the courts be included on the illustrative plan. <br /> Mr. Sullivan commented that tennis courts don't exist on the illustrative plan and noted <br /> comments made earlier by the Park and Recreation Commission. He asked if lighted or <br /> unlighted courts were permitted and could be developed in the future, even though they do not <br /> show currently. <br /> Mr. Rasmussen commented that they could be included. <br /> Mr. Fialho noted that the language that is included in the plan is broad enough to include <br /> them later. <br /> Tom Murphy, a Pleasanton resident, voiced his support of tennis courts on the Bernal <br /> Property. He further thanked the City Council for their consideration and flexibility and would <br /> like to see lighted tennis courts on the illustrative plan. <br /> Vic Ciaravino a Pleasanton resident, asked Council for clarification about property <br /> values and the Pheasant Ridge development related to street maintenance such as weeds and <br /> trash in roundabouts. He believed it was important to keep the quality of neighborhoods up. He <br /> further questioned Council regarding whether the City would be responsible once the developer <br /> left. He wants the Bernal property to be pleasant looking and the surrounding neighborhoods <br /> neat and clean. <br /> Mr. Fialho responded that he would have staff look into the matter. <br /> Kevin Close, a Happy Valley resident, encouraged the development of the equestrian <br /> trails and voiced his concern about groundwater contamination. <br /> Steven Woodward, a Livermore resident, informed the Council that other cities, like <br /> Davis, was more familiar with bike lanes and could lend some assistance. He supports the <br /> Bernal project and believed that bicycle lane and traffic issues needed to be addressed. <br /> Pleasanton City Council 8 05/16/06 <br /> Minutes <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.