Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Posson replied that what he is suggesting is considering the estimated <br /> 2030 RHNA numbers and based on the housing across the City, including the East <br /> Pleasanton Specific Plan, whatever that percentage is should be the percentage of <br /> RHNA allocation, accommodated by the East Pleasanton Specific Plan. He indicated <br /> that the reason he was asking is if it is 35 percent in the East Pleasanton Specific Plan, <br /> and then the rest was distributed across the City, and then, the City's allocation of <br /> multi-family to single-family is 28 percent, then the mix should be 28 percent/72 percent. <br /> Chair Blank noted that it would certainly be the number staff should run before it goes <br /> up to the City Council. <br /> Commissioner Posson noted that it would then be an equitable distribution across the <br /> community. <br /> Chair Blank and Commissioner Olson agreed. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor stated that he might be fine with that, depending on what <br /> those numbers looked like, and he might even be fine with going up. He added that if <br /> they were close, he would not have a problem with the East side having one or two <br /> extra percentage points because that it is a new area, so people moving into that area <br /> are going to know what that has been zoned. He continued that on the other hand, <br /> going back and rezoning older, developed part of the City and adding lots of apartment <br /> buildings next to existing residential communities that have been there for 20 or <br /> 30 years, would impact the people in these neighborhoods who do not have much <br /> choice as they are already there. He then asked if the School Board has ever looked at <br /> this 30-to-the-acre type of development and figured out how many students are <br /> expected to come out of that. He noted that there are not that many three-bedroom <br /> homes so not a lot of families will be moving in, maybe single parents with one child or <br /> two children. <br /> Mr. Dolan replied that the School District has a number that it has been using which is <br /> created by its consulting demographer. He noted that because the City does not have <br /> any of these new apartments built at this density that the School District could sample, <br /> the District is using data from existing apartments and comparing them to what the yield <br /> is in Dublin and places close by. He stated that there is no perfect match and noted that <br /> the yield is not high but there is a fair amount of units. He added that the District did its <br /> study a few years ago, right before the City knew for sure that it was going to be losing <br /> the housing cap. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor recalled that the District came up with a number that was <br /> somewhat less than one child per unit, on average, like a .8 or .7. <br /> Mr. Dolan replied that he does not remember what the number is but it was pretty small, <br /> definitely less than one child per unit. <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 12, 2013 Page 10 of 13 <br />