|
t •--• as ,1 j «. . .1 4
<br /> ..k.": -e ;'-.,0) ,..4".1, 2',•••■• .. ' 'Wirlri.'. 't j Valley AYe V:IIey,A++e•'+_ t y. - •t -
<br /> ,..:1114,/ r... ''.1,1 a ',.,r N. ..‹. -. - ..d- " " 1.'1%. .1," •••• ,W,: ... ..I...01, Alalawa...an
<br /> - Ell Li' ;-;.'', J -•
<br /> r....4444 , r ,,raa• 3-4 1V�` 1/ i r, �(,•_*' ,
<br /> 1 Bcukki•SI Badder$0 �. /i l•T; c. .• 1. + `,;•
<br /> ��
<br /> f : r \
<br /> __j• ,•f 1-11 f `42, ` s,. � .� .....4000' i•i1/ �4 - ,4:. _ ' m . .vb• � 1 t.•
<br /> 1 to
<br /> •1 �..^ _t r� g1Vd 1 - —. mow._ *
<br /> •._ � t r r'' ,4444 //. ,St�. t 1 S •- .. • J•1111 SnY- `t a . �,Ayn1 3 - ,{ yr.'r.4rrt�'.' �,`.,:
<br /> f O� ^'r r • r .; •ifs :� `�
<br /> i��_w� .y L..ko riot .01'2. . Q ) # ,
<br /> �. !1/i •i „ .jJ •e• • ( �'�� ^/� �' •r �� a•, i C `
<br /> �4• .' • a 5 1. CFA,. -•*-- I .
<br /> .•_„i 1s li
<br /> r >'r �~• . , Ri • 's _ +y :. .`,ti ; 44.t 44. _VrAkT A
<br /> • • {.J1.7. •� A - • •• _ - f•.•
<br /> ,,} pill c_ w _ Vtheyi d'
<br /> l A',..
<br /> {` " ,., •� ..i t r Arc
<br /> ∎■ii i1/ .Z h^ r '..:,..41,51i,11 .A — },i `c r��. -•y xi -µ, .••!!� - h K s ..+c Y , �r .v.neS�N>��a �, 4, c*� #r�i. .r.s k.
<br /> ,1.,• 1. 111 4 , • 1 .. a•r , -. . tip � �.
<br /> •^ 1•� - Ai-74 1.1....-140*• ...1� •... o ■y am.} ■ Tanny. sw� � 't ,.„•
<br /> a. r '�1.a !, ���,7 :of c. ,'�-' t ,t . �. �.. _ 'taus.J:r1: `4 $4 � t at,.T�
<br /> rC�re �� ` mw+wV.neyAtp'Ave _ �yl�Vi s Arse .r ra -'•ewz.r. , fio4w •�'� ,J �•r'
<br /> 2. Stanley/First Street between Valley/Bernal and Sunol Blvd
<br /> This roadway segment was also analyzed in the 2011 traffic study. This segment was identified as a deficient
<br /> segment and overriding considerations were outlined in the Environmental Report. The 25 mph segment of
<br /> First Street has insufficient capacity (both with and without the project), but widening First Street is not
<br /> feasible and the best mitigation to the traffic on First Street is the regional improvem.nt of State Route 84,
<br /> which removes significant volumes of traffic that currently travels from 680 to Livermore through Pleasanton.
<br /> 3. Sunol Blvd. on and off ramps
<br /> Sunol Boulevard at 1-680 is included in our General Plan list of improvements to have traffic signals installed.
<br /> The location meets our signal warrants and is currently ranked 6th on the list of future traffic signals. The
<br /> project is contributing to the construction of the traffic signals by paying the traffic inipact fee.
<br /> 4. LOS ratings of E or F
<br /> Bernal at Utah is considered LOS E / F in the report because of the side street delay it the peak hour. The
<br /> project will construct a traffic signal which will improve the level of service and reduce the side street delay.
<br /> 2
<br />
|